Evaluation of an on-farm fecal particle size separator

This study aims to validate an on-farm fecal particle size separator by comparing its performance against a laboratory method as the reference standard. Additionally, the device's applicability across different age groups (calves and adult cows) is evaluated. Fecal samples of 150 g each from calves and cows are dissolved in water and sieved through the on-farm device under water flow. Similarly, 15 g of the same samples are analyzed in the laboratory using an automatic sieve shaker. In both methods, the retained material is assessed. The analysis revealed a higher average percentage of retained material with the on-farm device. This is likely due to human error during operation: the on-farm method lacks a shaking component in order to remove access water, and the sieving duration is subjectively determined. Beyond human factors, the composition of the feces appears to influence the results. The overall better alignment between both methods in calves may be attributed to the underdeveloped gastrointestinal tract and differences in diet, which include milk feeding. In adult animals with developed rumination behavior and ingestion of larger particles, the increased number of microorganisms and soluble particles contained in the access water seem to cluster, thereby increasing the retained percentage in the on-farm method. Despite the observed differences, the development of standardized guidelines for implementation could make the device a cost-effective on-site tool for evaluating and optimizing calf feeding.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Phaidra - Repository of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34876/2xhq-zh58
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of an on-farm fecal particle size separator

Katharina Orovits
Phaidra - Repository of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Evaluation of an on-farm fecal particle size separator

Katharina Orovits
article en

Abstract

This study aims to validate an on-farm fecal particle size separator by comparing its performance against a laboratory method as the reference standard. Additionally, the device's applicability across different age groups (calves and adult cows) is evaluated. Fecal samples of 150 g each from calves and cows are dissolved in water and sieved through the on-farm device under water flow. Similarly, 15 g of the same samples are analyzed in the laboratory using an automatic sieve shaker. In both methods, the retained material is assessed. The analysis revealed a higher average percentage of retained material with the on-farm device. This is likely due to human error during operation: the on-farm method lacks a shaking component in order to remove access water, and the sieving duration is subjectively determined. Beyond human factors, the composition of the feces appears to influence the results. The overall better alignment between both methods in calves may be attributed to the underdeveloped gastrointestinal tract and differences in diet, which include milk feeding. In adult animals with developed rumination behavior and ingestion of larger particles, the increased number of microorganisms and soluble particles contained in the access water seem to cluster, thereby increasing the retained percentage in the on-farm method. Despite the observed differences, the development of standardized guidelines for implementation could make the device a cost-effective on-site tool for evaluating and optimizing calf feeding.

Phaidra - Repository of the University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.