Low-Dose CT Quality Assurance at Scale: Automated Detection of Overscanning, Underscanning, and Image Noise
Automated quality assurance is essential for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung screening, yet manual checks strain clinical workflows. We present a fully automated artificial intelligence tool that quantifies scan coverage and image noise in LDCT without user input. Lungs and the aorta are segmented to measure cranial/caudal over- and underscanning, and noise is computed as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units (HUs) within descending aortic blood, normalized to a 1 mm3 voxel. Performance was verified in a reader study of 98 LDCT scans from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), and then applied to 38,834 NLST scans reconstructed with a standard kernel. In the reader study, lung masks were rated ≥"Nearly Perfect" in 90.8% and aorta-blood masks in 96.9% of cases. Across 38,834 scans, mean overscanning distances were 31.21 mm caudally and 14.54 mm cranially; underscanning occurred in 4.36% (caudal) and 0.89% (cranial). The tool enables objective, large-scale monitoring of LDCT quality-reducing routine manual workload through exception-based human oversight, flagging protocol deviations, and supporting cross-center benchmarking-and may facilitate dose optimization by reducing systematic over- and underscanning.
Authors
- Christiane Katharina Kuhl (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8696-2363)
- Alexander Hermans (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2127-0782)
- Patrick Wienholt (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8350-4288)
- Daniel Santos (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1564-6985)
- Sven Nebelung
- Robert Siepmann
Institutions
- Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE)
- RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Life
- Published
- 2026-01-16
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3390/life16010152
- Primary Topic
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00