Bodyoids and Speculative Bioethics: A Response to Erler

Abstract Alexandre Erler’s commentary challenges our argument against creating human ‘bodyoids’. While he considers our concerns speculative, we briefly defend speculative bioethics as vital for anticipating ethical risks before technologies emerge. We maintain that historical practices such as organ procurement and embryo experimentation illustrate how instrumental uses of human bodies can erode moral boundaries. Erler’s confidence in safeguards like the dead donor rule is, we suggest, misplaced. Ethical reflection at this formative stage is essential to prevent the normalization of technologies that risk profound dehumanization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy & Technology
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-01026-9
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bodyoids and Speculative Bioethics: A Response to Erler

Christopher Alan Bobier, Bruce P. Blackshaw, Daniel J. Hurst, Daniel Rodger
Philosophy & Technology
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Bodyoids and Speculative Bioethics: A Response to Erler

Christopher Alan Bobier, Bruce P. Blackshaw, Daniel J. Hurst, Daniel Rodger
article en

Abstract

Abstract Alexandre Erler’s commentary challenges our argument against creating human ‘bodyoids’. While he considers our concerns speculative, we briefly defend speculative bioethics as vital for anticipating ethical risks before technologies emerge. We maintain that historical practices such as organ procurement and embryo experimentation illustrate how instrumental uses of human bodies can erode moral boundaries. Erler’s confidence in safeguards like the dead donor rule is, we suggest, misplaced. Ethical reflection at this formative stage is essential to prevent the normalization of technologies that risk profound dehumanization.

Philosophy & TechnologyVol. 39(1)
Central Michigan University (US), London South Bank University (GB), Rowan University (US), The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bodyoids and Speculative Bioethics: A Response to Erler — Christopher Alan Bobier, Bruce P. Blackshaw, et al. · Philosophy & Technology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS