Positive relationship between substrate-induced respiration rate and translationally active bacterial counts in soil

Soil microorganisms perform biogeochemical processes fundamental to soil functions. Bulk respiration, or microbial metabolic emission of CO<sub>2</sub>, is the classic indicator of soil biological activity. However, among the millions of microbes per gram of soil, only 0.1%-2.0% are metabolically active at any given time. Understanding the relationship between bulk soil respiration and microbial activity is complicated by microbes potentially awakening from quiescent states during incubation test periods. Here, we investigated this relationship through parallel measurements of substrate-induced respiration and translationally active cell counts using bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT). After a 6-h incubation of agricultural soil with glucose, galactose, or only water, active cell counts were positively correlated with respiration rates. As hypothesized, active cell numbers increased rapidly compared to total cell numbers after a 6-h incubation with glucose, suggesting newly activated cells. Additionally, carbon-amended soils respired more than water-only soils with similar active cell counts. This suggested that cells in carbon-rich environments were turning over freshly added carbon faster or metabolizing it less efficiently than those exposed to native substrates only. This study distinguishes for the first time microbial activation in the soil matrix using a translation signal, providing evidence that respiration rates reflect active cell numbers and varied metabolic responses, decoupled from cell growth upon soil wetting and carbon addition. We propose BONCAT as a useful tool to gain mechanistic insights into microbial activation and recommend combining it with tracking substrate incorporation and phylogenetics.IMPORTANCEMany critical ecosystem services provided by soils rely on active microbes, even though most soil microbes are known to be quiescent or dormant much of the time. This study demonstrates that microbes become translationally active within hours after substrate addition and that the correlation between active cell numbers and soil respiration rates varies with the type of substrate. Advancing knowledge in this area will enable better interpretation of bulk soil respiration tests by land managers and inform modeling efforts that relate soil microbial respiration to global carbon dynamics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
mSystems
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1128/msystems.01009-25
Primary Topic
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positive relationship between substrate-induced respiration rate and translationally active bacterial counts in soil

Daniel Wasner, Nina Camillone, Mary Ann Victoria Bruns, Estelle Couradeau et al.
mSystems
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
article

Positive relationship between substrate-induced respiration rate and translationally active bacterial counts in soil

Daniel Wasner, Nina Camillone, Mary Ann Victoria Bruns, Estelle Couradeau, Raúl Román
article en

Abstract

Soil microorganisms perform biogeochemical processes fundamental to soil functions. Bulk respiration, or microbial metabolic emission of CO<sub>2</sub>, is the classic indicator of soil biological activity. However, among the millions of microbes per gram of soil, only 0.1%-2.0% are metabolically active at any given time. Understanding the relationship between bulk soil respiration and microbial activity is complicated by microbes potentially awakening from quiescent states during incubation test periods. Here, we investigated this relationship through parallel measurements of substrate-induced respiration and translationally active cell counts using bioorthogonal non-canonical amino acid tagging (BONCAT). After a 6-h incubation of agricultural soil with glucose, galactose, or only water, active cell counts were positively correlated with respiration rates. As hypothesized, active cell numbers increased rapidly compared to total cell numbers after a 6-h incubation with glucose, suggesting newly activated cells. Additionally, carbon-amended soils respired more than water-only soils with similar active cell counts. This suggested that cells in carbon-rich environments were turning over freshly added carbon faster or metabolizing it less efficiently than those exposed to native substrates only. This study distinguishes for the first time microbial activation in the soil matrix using a translation signal, providing evidence that respiration rates reflect active cell numbers and varied metabolic responses, decoupled from cell growth upon soil wetting and carbon addition. We propose BONCAT as a useful tool to gain mechanistic insights into microbial activation and recommend combining it with tracking substrate incorporation and phylogenetics.IMPORTANCEMany critical ecosystem services provided by soils rely on active microbes, even though most soil microbes are known to be quiescent or dormant much of the time. This study demonstrates that microbes become translationally active within hours after substrate addition and that the correlation between active cell numbers and soil respiration rates varies with the type of substrate. Advancing knowledge in this area will enable better interpretation of bulk soil respiration tests by land managers and inform modeling efforts that relate soil microbial respiration to global carbon dynamics.

mSystemsVol. 11(2)
Oklahoma State Department of Health (US), Pennsylvania State University (US), ETH Zurich (CH), Department of Physiological Sciences (RU), University of Almería (ES)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.