Neurodivergence & Gender (Mis)Recognition: Addressing Inequity Through Neuroqueer Knowing

There is an established association between neurodivergence and gender variance, with growing documentation of the challenges and inequities faced by those who exist at this intersection. This paper contributes a critical analysis of interviews with 24 autistic adults in the U.S. about their gender experience; yielding three themes: “gender divergence?”, “gender socialization on crip time”, and “either/or: whose intolerance for ambiguity?”. Results suggest that gender variance—if it is best understood as such—among those on the spectrum emerges through a complex set of relationships between participants’ bodyminds (e.g., sensory and cognitive styles); dominant cultural concepts of gender; and ableist and heterocissexist social relations. Neuronormative ways of knowing gender, institutionalized through biomedical research, healthcare, and social policy, emerge as a normalizing discourse contributing to the oppression and marginalization of participants as neurodivergent people. Justice implications of accounting for the epistemology of the neurodivergent bodymind and decentering neuronormative ways of knowing are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Societies
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/soc16010031
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neurodivergence & Gender (Mis)Recognition: Addressing Inequity Through Neuroqueer Knowing

Jessica Penwell Barnett
Societies
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Neurodivergence & Gender (Mis)Recognition: Addressing Inequity Through Neuroqueer Knowing

Jessica Penwell Barnett
article en

Abstract

There is an established association between neurodivergence and gender variance, with growing documentation of the challenges and inequities faced by those who exist at this intersection. This paper contributes a critical analysis of interviews with 24 autistic adults in the U.S. about their gender experience; yielding three themes: “gender divergence?”, “gender socialization on crip time”, and “either/or: whose intolerance for ambiguity?”. Results suggest that gender variance—if it is best understood as such—among those on the spectrum emerges through a complex set of relationships between participants’ bodyminds (e.g., sensory and cognitive styles); dominant cultural concepts of gender; and ableist and heterocissexist social relations. Neuronormative ways of knowing gender, institutionalized through biomedical research, healthcare, and social policy, emerge as a normalizing discourse contributing to the oppression and marginalization of participants as neurodivergent people. Justice implications of accounting for the epistemology of the neurodivergent bodymind and decentering neuronormative ways of knowing are discussed.

SocietiesVol. 16(1)
Wright State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.