Primary health care networks and impacts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Primary healthcare provider networks (PHCPNs) are increasingly recognized as promising strategies to effectively strengthen health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is limited information on the influence PHCPNs may have on the process and clinical outcomes of health services. This study sought to answer the questions: what is the extent, range, and nature of research on PHCPNs in LMICs, what are the types of PHCPNs described, and what are the processes, e.g. access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, safety of care, and the clinical care outcomes of PHCPNs reported in the published literature? We report on a systematic mixed-methods review on PHCPNs as a strategy to strengthen health systems in LMICs following the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Mixed Methods Appraisal tools, while a narrative synthesis was employed to describe the results. Fifteen primary studies were found eligible for the review. From the included papers, eight types of PHCPNs were identified across various contexts and countries. We found that the PHCPNs primarily focus on maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes. The study reveals that: (i) PHCPNs contribute to improvements in the process outcomes of health services by enhancing access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, and safety of care, and (ii) they support improvements in clinical outcomes by helping to reduce maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortalities and stillbirths. This body of literature we reviewed suggests that PHCPNs make a difference in the process and clinical outcomes of health services in LMICs. This review serves as both a mapping and clarification exercise to promote the adoption of PHCPNs and as a foundation for further research, especially in areas of health services beyond maternal, newborn, and child health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Policy and Planning
Published
2026-01-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czag003
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Primary health care networks and impacts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Dominic Dormenyo Gadeka, Irène Akua Agyepong, Helen Elsey, Bassey Ebenso et al.
Health Policy and Planning
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Primary health care networks and impacts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Dominic Dormenyo Gadeka, Irène Akua Agyepong, Helen Elsey, Bassey Ebenso, Helen Bour, Genevieve Cecilia Aryeetey, Henry Okudzeto, Patrick Addo, Noemia Teixeira de Siqueira Filha
article en

Abstract

Primary healthcare provider networks (PHCPNs) are increasingly recognized as promising strategies to effectively strengthen health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is limited information on the influence PHCPNs may have on the process and clinical outcomes of health services. This study sought to answer the questions: what is the extent, range, and nature of research on PHCPNs in LMICs, what are the types of PHCPNs described, and what are the processes, e.g. access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, safety of care, and the clinical care outcomes of PHCPNs reported in the published literature? We report on a systematic mixed-methods review on PHCPNs as a strategy to strengthen health systems in LMICs following the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Mixed Methods Appraisal tools, while a narrative synthesis was employed to describe the results. Fifteen primary studies were found eligible for the review. From the included papers, eight types of PHCPNs were identified across various contexts and countries. We found that the PHCPNs primarily focus on maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes. The study reveals that: (i) PHCPNs contribute to improvements in the process outcomes of health services by enhancing access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, and safety of care, and (ii) they support improvements in clinical outcomes by helping to reduce maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortalities and stillbirths. This body of literature we reviewed suggests that PHCPNs make a difference in the process and clinical outcomes of health services in LMICs. This review serves as both a mapping and clarification exercise to promote the adoption of PHCPNs and as a foundation for further research, especially in areas of health services beyond maternal, newborn, and child health.

Health Policy and PlanningVol. 41(3)
University of Leeds (GB), University of Ghana (GH), Ghana College of Physicians and Surgeons (GH), University of York (GB), Hull York Medical School (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.