Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Foundation Position Statement on the Management of Adults With <scp>RRP</scp>

ABSTRACT Objective With regulatory approval of HPV‐specific immunotherapy for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) and growing experience with systemic bevacizumab, a management algorithm incorporating these medical treatments is warranted. Data Sources and Methods RRP Foundation (RRPF) Key Opinion Leaders offer a proposed management algorithm for adults with RRP considering published literature and commercial drug availability. Results Preventative HPV vaccination should be considered for all patients. Determination of HPV type and pulmonary imaging are important for contemporary RRP patient care and assist in decision making. Risks and benefits of papilloma debulking as needed versus medical management of RRP must be deliberated on a patient case‐by‐case basis. HPV ‐specific immunotherapy that induces an HPV ‐specific T cell response to target the underlying HPV infection that is the cause of RRP is safe, offers the possibility of durable disease control following a short treatment course and is the recommended first‐line medical treatment for patients who wish to avoid the risks of repeat procedural management. Papilloma disease control with systemic bevacizumab, which carries defined risks and must be continued for clinical benefit is the recommended second‐line medical treatment for patients who do not achieve a complete response with immunotherapy and wish to continue medical management. For patients who elect to be treated with debulking procedures as needed, use of locally‐administered adjuvant should be considered. Conclusion This proposed management algorithm from the RRPF serves as a contemporary resource and information guide for adult patients with RRP and their physicians considering treatment options. Level of Evidence 5

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Laryngoscope
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.70379
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.52
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Foundation Position Statement on the Management of Adults With RRP

Adam M. Klein, Simon R. Best, Laura Matrka, Aaron D. Friedman et al.
1 citations
The Laryngoscope
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
31.52
article

Recurrent Respiratory Papillomatosis Foundation Position Statement on the Management of Adults With RRP

Adam M. Klein, Simon R. Best, Laura Matrka, Aaron D. Friedman, Scott M. Norberg, Nabil F. Saba, Robert T. Sataloff, Milan R. Amin, C. ALLEN, Kim McClellan, David E. Rosow, Geoffrey D. Young, Kathryn A. Wikenheiser‐Brokamp, Clark A. Rosen, Ted Mau, H. Steven Sims, David G. Lott
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective With regulatory approval of HPV‐specific immunotherapy for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) and growing experience with systemic bevacizumab, a management algorithm incorporating these medical treatments is warranted. Data Sources and Methods RRP Foundation (RRPF) Key Opinion Leaders offer a proposed management algorithm for adults with RRP considering published literature and commercial drug availability. Results Preventative HPV vaccination should be considered for all patients. Determination of HPV type and pulmonary imaging are important for contemporary RRP patient care and assist in decision making. Risks and benefits of papilloma debulking as needed versus medical management of RRP must be deliberated on a patient case‐by‐case basis. HPV ‐specific immunotherapy that induces an HPV ‐specific T cell response to target the underlying HPV infection that is the cause of RRP is safe, offers the possibility of durable disease control following a short treatment course and is the recommended first‐line medical treatment for patients who wish to avoid the risks of repeat procedural management. Papilloma disease control with systemic bevacizumab, which carries defined risks and must be continued for clinical benefit is the recommended second‐line medical treatment for patients who do not achieve a complete response with immunotherapy and wish to continue medical management. For patients who elect to be treated with debulking procedures as needed, use of locally‐administered adjuvant should be considered. Conclusion This proposed management algorithm from the RRPF serves as a contemporary resource and information guide for adult patients with RRP and their physicians considering treatment options. Level of Evidence 5

The Laryngoscope
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Miami (US), Emory University (US), Palo Alto University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Florida International University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Lawrence Foundation (US), Piedmont Cancer Institute (US), Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US), Mayo Clinic Hospital (US), Perinatal Institute (GB), National Cancer Institute (US), Center for Cancer Research (US), Rush University (US), The Ohio State University (US), New York University (US), University of Cincinnati (US), Drexel University (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
31.52
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.