The Second Brenner Debate

Brenner believes that the decline in profitability that began in the mid-1960s was rootedin overcapacity and overproduction caused by intensified international competition in the manufacturing sector. The reason why the decline in profit rate caused by excessive competition has been delayed in recovery is mainly due to insufficient exit and excessive entry into the production sector with oversupply. Brenner criticized the supply-side explanation for only focusing on the “vertical” relationship between capital and labor, underestimating the “horizontal” relationship between capital and the resulting economic contradictions. Critics argue that the linear explanation of attributing the decline in profit rate to international competition is seriously flawed and cannot place labor relations at the center of capitalist historical narratives a priori. This article systematically reviews the debate surrounding Brenner's “Theory of Excessive International Competition” and summarizes it as “The Second Brenner Debate”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Political Economy Quarterly
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26599/peq2025.9310405
Primary Topic
Political Economy and Marxism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Second Brenner Debate

Bin Lü, Hongchi CHEN
Political Economy Quarterly
Political Economy and Marxism
article

The Second Brenner Debate

Bin Lü, Hongchi CHEN
article en

Abstract

Brenner believes that the decline in profitability that began in the mid-1960s was rootedin overcapacity and overproduction caused by intensified international competition in the manufacturing sector. The reason why the decline in profit rate caused by excessive competition has been delayed in recovery is mainly due to insufficient exit and excessive entry into the production sector with oversupply. Brenner criticized the supply-side explanation for only focusing on the “vertical” relationship between capital and labor, underestimating the “horizontal” relationship between capital and the resulting economic contradictions. Critics argue that the linear explanation of attributing the decline in profit rate to international competition is seriously flawed and cannot place labor relations at the center of capitalist historical narratives a priori. This article systematically reviews the debate surrounding Brenner's “Theory of Excessive International Competition” and summarizes it as “The Second Brenner Debate”.

Political Economy QuarterlyVol. 4(4)
Fujian Normal University (CN), Renmin University of China (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Political Economy and Marxism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Second Brenner Debate — Bin Lü, Hongchi CHEN · Political Economy Quarterly (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS