Assessment of Eating Behavior and Genetic Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome

<b>Background</b>: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is influenced by behavioral and genetic factors, yet evidence on eating behavior patterns and related genetic polymorphisms in Central Asian populations remains limited. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess eating behaviors among adults with and without MetS and evaluate their associations with clinical indicators and ADIPOQ rs266729 and MC4R rs17782313 variants. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study of 200 adults (115 non-MetS, 85 MetS) was conducted using Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ), standardized clinical measurements, and PCR-RFLP genotyping. <b>Results</b>: Participants with MetS were older than non-MetS adults (52 vs. 47 years; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and had substantially higher systolic blood pressure (126 vs. 114 mmHg; <i>p</i> < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (83 vs. 74 mmHg; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and BMI (32.2 vs. 25.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Waist circumference, hip circumference, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL were also significantly higher, while HDL was lower (1.13 ± 0.40 vs. 1.58 ± 1.50 mmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.008). DEBQ restrained, emotional, and external eating scores showed no differences between groups (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Eating behavior distribution was similar (<i>p</i> = 0.291). ADIPOQ genotypes (CC/CG/GG) did not differ by MetS status (<i>p</i> = 0.227), nor did MC4R variants (<i>p</i> = 0.679). Among MetS participants, clinical indicators did not vary across eating behavior categories, and no associations were observed between eating behavior and either polymorphism. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite clear clinical and metabolic differences between MetS and non-MetS groups, neither eating behavior patterns nor ADIPOQ and MC4R variants were associated with metabolic measures among MetS group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020739
Primary Topic
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Eating Behavior and Genetic Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome

U.B. Tatykayeva, Gulnaz Nuskabayeva, Ainur Turmanbayeva, Dilbar Aidarbekova et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
article

Assessment of Eating Behavior and Genetic Risk Factors for Metabolic Syndrome

U.B. Tatykayeva, Gulnaz Nuskabayeva, Ainur Turmanbayeva, Dilbar Aidarbekova, Dinara Nemetova, Dana Kaldarkhan, Yusuf Ozkul, Bibigul Tastemirova, Ainash Oshibayeva, Dinara Azizkhojayeva, Kanatzhan Kemelbekov, Karlygash Sadykova
article en

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is influenced by behavioral and genetic factors, yet evidence on eating behavior patterns and related genetic polymorphisms in Central Asian populations remains limited. Aim: The aim of this study was to assess eating behaviors among adults with and without MetS and evaluate their associations with clinical indicators and ADIPOQ rs266729 and MC4R rs17782313 variants. <b>Methods</b>: A cross-sectional study of 200 adults (115 non-MetS, 85 MetS) was conducted using Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ), standardized clinical measurements, and PCR-RFLP genotyping. <b>Results</b>: Participants with MetS were older than non-MetS adults (52 vs. 47 years; <i>p</i> = 0.004) and had substantially higher systolic blood pressure (126 vs. 114 mmHg; <i>p</i> < 0.001), diastolic blood pressure (83 vs. 74 mmHg; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and BMI (32.2 vs. 25.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Waist circumference, hip circumference, triglycerides, total cholesterol, and LDL were also significantly higher, while HDL was lower (1.13 ± 0.40 vs. 1.58 ± 1.50 mmol/L; <i>p</i> = 0.008). DEBQ restrained, emotional, and external eating scores showed no differences between groups (all <i>p</i> > 0.05). Eating behavior distribution was similar (<i>p</i> = 0.291). ADIPOQ genotypes (CC/CG/GG) did not differ by MetS status (<i>p</i> = 0.227), nor did MC4R variants (<i>p</i> = 0.679). Among MetS participants, clinical indicators did not vary across eating behavior categories, and no associations were observed between eating behavior and either polymorphism. <b>Conclusions</b>: Despite clear clinical and metabolic differences between MetS and non-MetS groups, neither eating behavior patterns nor ADIPOQ and MC4R variants were associated with metabolic measures among MetS group.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Ahmet Yesevi University (KZ), South Kazakhstan Medical Academy (KZ), Erciyes University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.