Patient Choice

Breasts hold multifaceted significance in modern society, encompassing elements of motherhood, sexuality, and female identity. Diseases of the breast can thus result in uniquely complex decision making, particularly in the case of malignancy when mastectomy is indicated. Patient narratives reveal the profound impact of breast loss on self-perception, femininity, and community belonging. Although post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is empirically well supported, intersecting societal pressures and surgeon biases may challenge the autonomy of patients deciding on reconstructive options.This article critically examines various factors involved in decision-making in breast reconstruction following mastectomy, highlighting the significance of patient autonomy. We excavate the historical, sociocultural, and economic influences that may have tilted the current balance in favor of breast reconstruction. While considering the benefits of this shift, we examine the potential existing biases that may influence patient decisions. We emphasize that autonomy is a central ethical consideration in navigating complex reconstructive decisions and promoting patient-centered care. We hope that our work will contribute to a broader discussion on the value placed on breasts and reinforce the agency breast cancer survivors have in decision making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/sap.0000000000004636
Primary Topic
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient Choice

Brian C. Drolet, Nikita Bastin, Carrie A. Kubiak, Mariam Saad
Annals of Plastic Surgery
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
article

Patient Choice

Brian C. Drolet, Nikita Bastin, Carrie A. Kubiak, Mariam Saad
article en

Abstract

Breasts hold multifaceted significance in modern society, encompassing elements of motherhood, sexuality, and female identity. Diseases of the breast can thus result in uniquely complex decision making, particularly in the case of malignancy when mastectomy is indicated. Patient narratives reveal the profound impact of breast loss on self-perception, femininity, and community belonging. Although post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is empirically well supported, intersecting societal pressures and surgeon biases may challenge the autonomy of patients deciding on reconstructive options.This article critically examines various factors involved in decision-making in breast reconstruction following mastectomy, highlighting the significance of patient autonomy. We excavate the historical, sociocultural, and economic influences that may have tilted the current balance in favor of breast reconstruction. While considering the benefits of this shift, we examine the potential existing biases that may influence patient decisions. We emphasize that autonomy is a central ethical consideration in navigating complex reconstructive decisions and promoting patient-centered care. We hope that our work will contribute to a broader discussion on the value placed on breasts and reinforce the agency breast cancer survivors have in decision making.

Annals of Plastic SurgeryVol. 96(3)
Vanderbilt University (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Breast Implant and Reconstruction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Patient Choice — Brian C. Drolet, Nikita Bastin, et al. · Annals of Plastic Surgery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS