Analyzing Public Perceptions of Mobility Electrification in Germany and China Through Social Media with Large Language Models

This study investigates cross-cultural differences in public perception of mobility electrification by applying natural language processing (NLP) techniques to social media discourse in Germany and China. Using a large language model (LLM), this study conducted sentiment analysis and zero-shot text classification on over 10,000 posts to explore how citizens in each country engage with the topic of electric mobility. Results reveal that while infrastructure readiness is a dominant concern in both contexts, German discourse places greater emphasis on environmental impact, often reflecting skepticism toward sustainability claims. On the other hand, Chinese discussions highlight technological advancement and infrastructure expansion, with comparatively limited focus on environmental concerns. These findings show the importance of culturally tailored policy and communication strategies in supporting the public acceptance of electric mobility. By demonstrating how artificial intelligence-driven large-scale social media data analysis can be used to analyze public sentiment across linguistic and cultural contexts, this study contributes methodologically to the emerging field of computational social science and offers practical insights for mobility policy in diverse national settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vehicles
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/vehicles8010021
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analyzing Public Perceptions of Mobility Electrification in Germany and China Through Social Media with Large Language Models

Hamid Mostofi, Kaplan Ugur Bulut
Vehicles
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
article

Analyzing Public Perceptions of Mobility Electrification in Germany and China Through Social Media with Large Language Models

Hamid Mostofi, Kaplan Ugur Bulut
article en

Abstract

This study investigates cross-cultural differences in public perception of mobility electrification by applying natural language processing (NLP) techniques to social media discourse in Germany and China. Using a large language model (LLM), this study conducted sentiment analysis and zero-shot text classification on over 10,000 posts to explore how citizens in each country engage with the topic of electric mobility. Results reveal that while infrastructure readiness is a dominant concern in both contexts, German discourse places greater emphasis on environmental impact, often reflecting skepticism toward sustainability claims. On the other hand, Chinese discussions highlight technological advancement and infrastructure expansion, with comparatively limited focus on environmental concerns. These findings show the importance of culturally tailored policy and communication strategies in supporting the public acceptance of electric mobility. By demonstrating how artificial intelligence-driven large-scale social media data analysis can be used to analyze public sentiment across linguistic and cultural contexts, this study contributes methodologically to the emerging field of computational social science and offers practical insights for mobility policy in diverse national settings.

VehiclesVol. 8(1)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Technische Universität Berlin
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.