Quantitative analyses by combined energy and wavelength dispersive spectrometry: The best of both worlds

Abstract This paper focuses on the ability of an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) or a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with wavelength and energy dispersive spectrometers (WDS and EDS) to use both these detectors for their standard-based quantitative X-ray analysis to yield precise and accurate compositions. This approach can be extremely useful to improve the analytical capabilities at the micron-scale, notably to: reduce the total analysis time,improve the precision and accuracy on minor and trace elements in beam sensitive materials,improve the accuracy by choosing WDS analysis for elements suffering from a poor peak-to-background ratio and low count rate on EDS (e.g., trace elements, light elements) or of a strong interference by EDS,permit the post-analysis quantification of an unsuspected element,enable a lifeline to salvage quantitative data after a WDS hardware failure or a change in the environment affecting one or more WDS (i.e., room temperature),or a combination of the above, and possibly more.First, we evaluate the reliability of EDS versus WDS data in geological samples on our EPMA and SEM instruments. A general silicate analysis setup is designed to prove that identical results can be obtained for major and minor elements down to ∼0.5 wt% in a variety of common rock-forming minerals. In the second step, the analysis of natural and synthetic glass by classical WDS-only EPMA analysis versus EDS on an SEM, the latter being appreciated for both its standard-based and standardless options. Finally, two real-case applications of combined EDS-WDS analysis are presented: (1) halogens and few minor to trace elements analysis in apatite, such as S, Ce, Si, Na, Fe, Mg, and Mn at low current and high resolution (≤ 10 nA, 2 to 10 μm beam size) and Ca and P analyzed by EDS, and (2) trace analysis of P-in-olivine (and other elements such as Cr and Al) at high current (≥ 200 nA) and focused beam with Si, Fe, Mg, and Mn by EDS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Mineralogist
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2025-10014
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
16.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative analyses by combined energy and wavelength dispersive spectrometry: The best of both worlds

Răzvan‐Gabriel Popa, Julien Allaz, Julian-Christopher Storck, Peter Ulmer et al.
1 citations
American Mineralogist
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
16.87
article

Quantitative analyses by combined energy and wavelength dispersive spectrometry: The best of both worlds

Răzvan‐Gabriel Popa, Julien Allaz, Julian-Christopher Storck, Peter Ulmer, Olivier Bachmann, Éric Reusser, Lukas Martin, Arka Chatterjee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This paper focuses on the ability of an electron probe microanalyzer (EPMA) or a scanning electron microscope (SEM) equipped with wavelength and energy dispersive spectrometers (WDS and EDS) to use both these detectors for their standard-based quantitative X-ray analysis to yield precise and accurate compositions. This approach can be extremely useful to improve the analytical capabilities at the micron-scale, notably to: reduce the total analysis time,improve the precision and accuracy on minor and trace elements in beam sensitive materials,improve the accuracy by choosing WDS analysis for elements suffering from a poor peak-to-background ratio and low count rate on EDS (e.g., trace elements, light elements) or of a strong interference by EDS,permit the post-analysis quantification of an unsuspected element,enable a lifeline to salvage quantitative data after a WDS hardware failure or a change in the environment affecting one or more WDS (i.e., room temperature),or a combination of the above, and possibly more.First, we evaluate the reliability of EDS versus WDS data in geological samples on our EPMA and SEM instruments. A general silicate analysis setup is designed to prove that identical results can be obtained for major and minor elements down to ∼0.5 wt% in a variety of common rock-forming minerals. In the second step, the analysis of natural and synthetic glass by classical WDS-only EPMA analysis versus EDS on an SEM, the latter being appreciated for both its standard-based and standardless options. Finally, two real-case applications of combined EDS-WDS analysis are presented: (1) halogens and few minor to trace elements analysis in apatite, such as S, Ce, Si, Na, Fe, Mg, and Mn at low current and high resolution (≤ 10 nA, 2 to 10 μm beam size) and Ca and P analyzed by EDS, and (2) trace analysis of P-in-olivine (and other elements such as Cr and Al) at high current (≥ 200 nA) and focused beam with Si, Fe, Mg, and Mn by EDS.

American Mineralogist
Planetary Science Institute (US), National Cooperative for the Disposal of Radioactive Waste (Switzerland) (CH)
National Science Foundation, Smithsonian Institution, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, University of Colorado Boulder
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques
16.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.