Transmission, turbines, and trust: The social dynamics and narratives of opposition to renewable energy infrastructure in regional Australia

Governments around the world are decarbonising their energy systems, resulting in a rapid and widespread buildout of new renewable energy generation, storage, and transmission infrastructure. This effort has encountered opposition, including place-based movements in regional areas required to host the infrastructure. Despite growing attention to renewable energy opposition, little is known about the social dynamics within these movements or what participation in them means for those involved. This study provides new and novel insight into the social dynamics and narratives of a regional Australian anti-renewables movement. Drawing on qualitative data from 19 semi-structured interviews with members of the opposition movement in the Wimmera Mallee region of western Victoria, Australia, we find that the social dynamics present in the movement can be understood as an emerging social identity with attendant social norms, shaped by strong links to place. Within this emerging social identity there is vigilant attentiveness to demarcations between ingroups and outgroups, and meaning provided by narratives that frame renewable energy infrastructure as the physical manifestation of deepening distrust of a range of social others including government, renewable energy proponents, and ‘greenie’ actors. For some, opposition to renewables is an extension of resistance to perceived government overreach that began with responses to COVID-19. Our research reveals that navigating this social conflict requires recognising that opposition to infrastructure extends far beyond technical concerns about transmission towers and turbines, instead encompassing a complex web of trust, social identities, place attachments, and intergroup dynamics. • Qualitative study of regional renewable infrastructure opposition movement • Mobilisation is due to landscape protection as well as social grievances • The opposition movement dynamics reveal an emerging social identity • Distrust of renewable energy infrastructure proponents is of central importance

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.104546
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transmission, turbines, and trust: The social dynamics and narratives of opposition to renewable energy infrastructure in regional Australia

R. M. Colvin, Eleanor Buckley
Energy Research & Social Science
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
article

Transmission, turbines, and trust: The social dynamics and narratives of opposition to renewable energy infrastructure in regional Australia

R. M. Colvin, Eleanor Buckley
article en

Abstract

Governments around the world are decarbonising their energy systems, resulting in a rapid and widespread buildout of new renewable energy generation, storage, and transmission infrastructure. This effort has encountered opposition, including place-based movements in regional areas required to host the infrastructure. Despite growing attention to renewable energy opposition, little is known about the social dynamics within these movements or what participation in them means for those involved. This study provides new and novel insight into the social dynamics and narratives of a regional Australian anti-renewables movement. Drawing on qualitative data from 19 semi-structured interviews with members of the opposition movement in the Wimmera Mallee region of western Victoria, Australia, we find that the social dynamics present in the movement can be understood as an emerging social identity with attendant social norms, shaped by strong links to place. Within this emerging social identity there is vigilant attentiveness to demarcations between ingroups and outgroups, and meaning provided by narratives that frame renewable energy infrastructure as the physical manifestation of deepening distrust of a range of social others including government, renewable energy proponents, and ‘greenie’ actors. For some, opposition to renewables is an extension of resistance to perceived government overreach that began with responses to COVID-19. Our research reveals that navigating this social conflict requires recognising that opposition to infrastructure extends far beyond technical concerns about transmission towers and turbines, instead encompassing a complex web of trust, social identities, place attachments, and intergroup dynamics. • Qualitative study of regional renewable infrastructure opposition movement • Mobilisation is due to landscape protection as well as social grievances • The opposition movement dynamics reveal an emerging social identity • Distrust of renewable energy infrastructure proponents is of central importance

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 132
Australian National University (AU)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Transmission, turbines, and trust: The social dynamics and narratives of opposition to renewable energy infrastructure in regional Australia — R. M. Colvin, Eleanor Buckley · Energy Research & Social Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS