Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Effectively Enhance Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes?—A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies from 2023 to 2025

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) shows transformative potential in mathematics education. However, empirical findings remain inconsistent, and a systematic synthesis of its effects across distinct engagement dimensions is lacking. This preregistered meta-analysis (INPLASY2025110051) systematically reviewed 22 empirical studies (46 independent samples, N = 5232) published between 2023 and 2025. The results indicated that GenAI has a moderate positive impact on students’ mathematics learning outcomes (g = 0.534). Moderation analysis further revealed that the level of GenAI integration in teaching, sample size, and learning content are the primary factors influencing this effect. The study found that the effect was most pronounced under the creative transformation (CT) integration mode, was significant when applied to geometry learning, and was stronger in studies with small samples or small class sizes; collaborative learning approaches also significantly enhance these mathematics learning outcomes. By contrast, educational stage and intervention duration did not show significant moderating effects. The GRADE assessment indicated that while the overall evidence is supportive, the certainty of evidence is stronger for cognitive outcomes than for non-cognitive domains. The findings also offer a reference for future research on constructing a human–machine collaborative learning environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Sciences
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010140
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
192.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Effectively Enhance Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes?—A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies from 2023 to 2025

Wenlan Zhang, Baoxin Liu, Fangfang Wang
1 citations
Education Sciences
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
192.69
article

Can Generative Artificial Intelligence Effectively Enhance Students’ Mathematics Learning Outcomes?—A Meta-Analysis of Empirical Studies from 2023 to 2025

Wenlan Zhang, Baoxin Liu, Fangfang Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) shows transformative potential in mathematics education. However, empirical findings remain inconsistent, and a systematic synthesis of its effects across distinct engagement dimensions is lacking. This preregistered meta-analysis (INPLASY2025110051) systematically reviewed 22 empirical studies (46 independent samples, N = 5232) published between 2023 and 2025. The results indicated that GenAI has a moderate positive impact on students’ mathematics learning outcomes (g = 0.534). Moderation analysis further revealed that the level of GenAI integration in teaching, sample size, and learning content are the primary factors influencing this effect. The study found that the effect was most pronounced under the creative transformation (CT) integration mode, was significant when applied to geometry learning, and was stronger in studies with small samples or small class sizes; collaborative learning approaches also significantly enhance these mathematics learning outcomes. By contrast, educational stage and intervention duration did not show significant moderating effects. The GRADE assessment indicated that while the overall evidence is supportive, the certainty of evidence is stronger for cognitive outcomes than for non-cognitive domains. The findings also offer a reference for future research on constructing a human–machine collaborative learning environment.

Education SciencesVol. 16(1)
Shaanxi Normal University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
192.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.