Exploring the Patient Voice in Decisions Around Organ-Preserving Rectal Cancer Treatment

Abstract The patient's decision to pursue organ-sparing treatment for rectal cancer is nuanced and profoundly personal. As organ-sparing approaches like Watch-and-Wait become more widely adopted, it is increasingly important to understand how patients experience and navigate these complex decisions. Patients and providers may weigh treatment outcomes differently, reflecting varied priorities around survival, bowel function, and quality of life. This commentary draws on patient quotes to explore three key stages of decision-making: learning about treatment options, aligning values with choices, and coping with the aftermath of the decision. We highlight that patients often need tailored communication and educational resources to support understanding, that for some, avoiding an ostomy carries as much weight as oncologic outcomes like recurrence and survival, and that coping with intensive surveillance after treatment involves both emotional and logistical challenges that require ongoing support. These reflections underscore the need for accessible, patient-centered educational resources, communication strategies, and decision-support tools as organ-sparing treatments for rectal cancer become more widely implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2771-7784
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Patient Voice in Decisions Around Organ-Preserving Rectal Cancer Treatment

Kera Kwan
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Exploring the Patient Voice in Decisions Around Organ-Preserving Rectal Cancer Treatment

Kera Kwan
article en

Abstract

Abstract The patient's decision to pursue organ-sparing treatment for rectal cancer is nuanced and profoundly personal. As organ-sparing approaches like Watch-and-Wait become more widely adopted, it is increasingly important to understand how patients experience and navigate these complex decisions. Patients and providers may weigh treatment outcomes differently, reflecting varied priorities around survival, bowel function, and quality of life. This commentary draws on patient quotes to explore three key stages of decision-making: learning about treatment options, aligning values with choices, and coping with the aftermath of the decision. We highlight that patients often need tailored communication and educational resources to support understanding, that for some, avoiding an ostomy carries as much weight as oncologic outcomes like recurrence and survival, and that coping with intensive surveillance after treatment involves both emotional and logistical challenges that require ongoing support. These reflections underscore the need for accessible, patient-centered educational resources, communication strategies, and decision-support tools as organ-sparing treatments for rectal cancer become more widely implemented.

Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.