Quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Time for a paradigm shift

Genotoxicity plays an important role in chemical safety assessment, as genetic alterations can lead to severe and irreversible health consequences. To date, the assessment of genotoxicity has mostly been limited to hazard identification, followed by rigorous risk mitigation measures if a substance is found to be mutagenic, regardless of potency, the underlying mechanism, and cellular biology. While this regulatory hazard-based approach is straightforward, it is unsatisfactory when exposure to genotoxic substances cannot be completely avoided and/or regulatory measures lead to misperceptions of risk and undesirable socioeconomic side effects. The latter becomes particularly obvious in light of natural genotoxicants, e.g. occurring in plant-based food, and for substances that are difficult to replace but come with a high socioeconomic value but little potency and exposure. Hence, there is an increasing demand for a paradigm shift towards a quantitative interpretation of genotoxicity data in regulatory risk assessment. However, moving away from the traditional hazard-based assessment and doing so safely requires a collective effort of all relevant stakeholders. To this end, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) organised an international symposium, at which experts from regulatory authorities, academia and industry discussed the opportunities and challenges involved. Here, we present key issues to be considered for a successful implementation of quantitative approaches. In situations where exposure to genotoxic substances cannot be completely avoided, e.g. occurrence of contaminants, quantitative approaches offer the opportunity to better characterise the associated risks and thus enable risk managers to make more informed decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environment International
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2026.110070
Primary Topic
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Time for a paradigm shift

Sebastian Schmeisser, Stefan Pfuhler, R Frötschl, E. Dogliotti et al.
Environment International
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
article

Quantitative evaluation of genotoxicity data for risk assessment and regulatory decision-making: Time for a paradigm shift

Sebastian Schmeisser, Stefan Pfuhler, R Frötschl, E. Dogliotti, George E. Johnson, Jeannette König, K. Herrmann, Andreas Hensel, Raffaella Corvi, Ulrike Gündel, Benjamin Sachse, Norman Ertych, Tewes Tralau, Hans-Jörg Martus, Stephanie Smith-Roe, Carsten Kneuer, Helga Stopper, Paul White, Jan van Benthem
article en

Abstract

Genotoxicity plays an important role in chemical safety assessment, as genetic alterations can lead to severe and irreversible health consequences. To date, the assessment of genotoxicity has mostly been limited to hazard identification, followed by rigorous risk mitigation measures if a substance is found to be mutagenic, regardless of potency, the underlying mechanism, and cellular biology. While this regulatory hazard-based approach is straightforward, it is unsatisfactory when exposure to genotoxic substances cannot be completely avoided and/or regulatory measures lead to misperceptions of risk and undesirable socioeconomic side effects. The latter becomes particularly obvious in light of natural genotoxicants, e.g. occurring in plant-based food, and for substances that are difficult to replace but come with a high socioeconomic value but little potency and exposure. Hence, there is an increasing demand for a paradigm shift towards a quantitative interpretation of genotoxicity data in regulatory risk assessment. However, moving away from the traditional hazard-based assessment and doing so safely requires a collective effort of all relevant stakeholders. To this end, the German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) organised an international symposium, at which experts from regulatory authorities, academia and industry discussed the opportunities and challenges involved. Here, we present key issues to be considered for a successful implementation of quantitative approaches. In situations where exposure to genotoxic substances cannot be completely avoided, e.g. occurrence of contaminants, quantitative approaches offer the opportunity to better characterise the associated risks and thus enable risk managers to make more informed decisions.

Environment InternationalVol. 208
Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (DE), Novartis (Switzerland) (CH), Health Canada (CA), University of Würzburg (DE), Istituto Superiore di Sanità (IT), European Commission (BE), Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (DE), Swansea University (GB), Triangle (US), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (US), National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL), Max Rubner Institut (DE), Procter & Gamble (United States) (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.