Towards a systematic and explicit legitimate aims test in human rights challenges to EU entities

ABSTRACT This contribution explores the European Union’s dual role as both a recipient and a shaper of international human rights norms, focusing on the potential human rights erosive effects of European Union (EU) law-making—specifically the forthcoming Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation. Whilst the EU legal order offers both direct and indirect remedies to challenge EU legislation before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), these mechanisms are hindered by procedural, admissibility, and legal design constraints. The article argues that Article 52(1) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR), provides underutilized potential for substantive judicial human rights review of EU law. By extending the application of the legitimate aims test (LAT) beyond qualified rights to absolute rights and treating the LAT as a conceptually distinct standard from proportionality, the article contends that the CJEU can more effectively assess whether EU legislative aims unjustifiably erode fundamental rights. Through this two-pronged argument, the paper demonstrates how reinterpreting the CFR’s limitations clause could enhance the EU’s system of human rights protection, offering a more robust judicial safeguard against rights-restrictive policy- and law-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Human Rights Law Review
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngaf045
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards a systematic and explicit legitimate aims test in human rights challenges to EU entities

Joyce De Coninck
Human Rights Law Review
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Towards a systematic and explicit legitimate aims test in human rights challenges to EU entities

Joyce De Coninck
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This contribution explores the European Union’s dual role as both a recipient and a shaper of international human rights norms, focusing on the potential human rights erosive effects of European Union (EU) law-making—specifically the forthcoming Crisis and Force Majeure Regulation. Whilst the EU legal order offers both direct and indirect remedies to challenge EU legislation before the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU), these mechanisms are hindered by procedural, admissibility, and legal design constraints. The article argues that Article 52(1) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFR), provides underutilized potential for substantive judicial human rights review of EU law. By extending the application of the legitimate aims test (LAT) beyond qualified rights to absolute rights and treating the LAT as a conceptually distinct standard from proportionality, the article contends that the CJEU can more effectively assess whether EU legislative aims unjustifiably erode fundamental rights. Through this two-pronged argument, the paper demonstrates how reinterpreting the CFR’s limitations clause could enhance the EU’s system of human rights protection, offering a more robust judicial safeguard against rights-restrictive policy- and law-making.

Human Rights Law ReviewVol. 26(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Towards a systematic and explicit legitimate aims test in human rights challenges to EU entities — Joyce De Coninck · Human Rights Law Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS