Validation of the Dutch Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-60 and MPFI-24) and its predictive value for mental health

Psychological flexibility, the capacity to remain open, present, and value-driven even in the face of distress, is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of mental health. The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch translations of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-60) and its short form (MPFI-24) and to examine the prospective relation with mental health. A community sample of Dutch-speaking adults (N=832; mean age: 55(SD:13)) completed self-report measures on psychological flexibility and mental health. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor second-order model representing psychological flexibility and inflexibility, providing a good fit for both the full and short versions. Regarding the MPFI-24 the 12-factor model had an even better fit. Internal consistency across all subscales of both instruments was good. Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility were prospectively associated with well-being and mental health complaints, respectively. However, when both constructs were included in the regression models, only psychological inflexibility emerged as a significant predictor of mental health complaints, including depression, anxiety and stress. The findings support the use of the Dutch MPFI as a valuable tool for assessing psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility, with the shorter MPFI-24 offering a more practical and efficient alternative in both clinical practice and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/974q5_v3
Primary Topic
Resilience and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the Dutch Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-60 and MPFI-24) and its predictive value for mental health

Sanne Peeters, Jennifer Reijnders, W. Kroeze, Marjan D. Nijkamp et al.
Resilience and Mental Health
article

Validation of the Dutch Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-60 and MPFI-24) and its predictive value for mental health

Sanne Peeters, Jennifer Reijnders, W. Kroeze, Marjan D. Nijkamp, Tim Batink, Ineke Bodok, Nele Jacobs
article en

Abstract

Psychological flexibility, the capacity to remain open, present, and value-driven even in the face of distress, is increasingly recognized as a key determinant of mental health. The aim of this study was to validate the Dutch translations of the Multidimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (MPFI-60) and its short form (MPFI-24) and to examine the prospective relation with mental health. A community sample of Dutch-speaking adults (N=832; mean age: 55(SD:13)) completed self-report measures on psychological flexibility and mental health. Confirmatory factor analyses supported a two-factor second-order model representing psychological flexibility and inflexibility, providing a good fit for both the full and short versions. Regarding the MPFI-24 the 12-factor model had an even better fit. Internal consistency across all subscales of both instruments was good. Hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility were prospectively associated with well-being and mental health complaints, respectively. However, when both constructs were included in the regression models, only psychological inflexibility emerged as a significant predictor of mental health complaints, including depression, anxiety and stress. The findings support the use of the Dutch MPFI as a valuable tool for assessing psychological flexibility and psychological inflexibility, with the shorter MPFI-24 offering a more practical and efficient alternative in both clinical practice and research.

Hong Kong Metropolitan University (HK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Resilience and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.