Merleau‐Ponty on painting, sedimentation, and the cultural world

Abstract A distinctive feature of Merleau‐Ponty's thought in the 1950s is his use of painting as a model for the production and transmission of cultural meaning, based partly on a critical appropriation of Husserl's notion of sedimentation. By examining Merleau‐Ponty's application of this notion to painting, as contrasted with Husserl's focus on geometry, this article explores what ‘sedimentation’ comprises in a philosophical context and why Merleau‐Ponty's view is potentially interesting. It begins by reviewing the problem Husserl discerned in relation to geometry and how sedimentation was to solve this, before outlining how Merleau‐Ponty's view evolves from Phenomenology of Perception onwards to allow rather than excluding sedimentation in painting. I then argue that the underlying difference between their views is that painting is concerned with non‐identical concrete artefacts whereas geometry focuses on identity‐based type artefacts, and that this difference is philosophically significant in pointing to a variety of sense‐realizing practices with corresponding modes of sedimentation. Having unpacked some of its further implications for the relation between their positions and conceiving a ‘cultural world’, I show how Merleau‐Ponty's views can be applied to certain aspects of identity constitution and as an alternative to unduly abstract ‘top down’ models of historical meaning transmission.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Philosophy
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/ejop.70063
Primary Topic
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Merleau‐Ponty on painting, sedimentation, and the cultural world

Andrew Inkpin
European Journal of Philosophy
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
article

Merleau‐Ponty on painting, sedimentation, and the cultural world

Andrew Inkpin
article en

Abstract

Abstract A distinctive feature of Merleau‐Ponty's thought in the 1950s is his use of painting as a model for the production and transmission of cultural meaning, based partly on a critical appropriation of Husserl's notion of sedimentation. By examining Merleau‐Ponty's application of this notion to painting, as contrasted with Husserl's focus on geometry, this article explores what ‘sedimentation’ comprises in a philosophical context and why Merleau‐Ponty's view is potentially interesting. It begins by reviewing the problem Husserl discerned in relation to geometry and how sedimentation was to solve this, before outlining how Merleau‐Ponty's view evolves from Phenomenology of Perception onwards to allow rather than excluding sedimentation in painting. I then argue that the underlying difference between their views is that painting is concerned with non‐identical concrete artefacts whereas geometry focuses on identity‐based type artefacts, and that this difference is philosophically significant in pointing to a variety of sense‐realizing practices with corresponding modes of sedimentation. Having unpacked some of its further implications for the relation between their positions and conceiving a ‘cultural world’, I show how Merleau‐Ponty's views can be applied to certain aspects of identity constitution and as an alternative to unduly abstract ‘top down’ models of historical meaning transmission.

European Journal of Philosophy
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.