Evaluating Explainability: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable AI Features in Medical Imaging

Explainability features are intended to provide insight into the internal mechanisms of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) device, but there is a lack of evaluation techniques for assessing the quality of provided explanations. We propose a framework to assess and report explainable AI features in medical images. Our evaluation framework for AI explainability is based on four criteria that relate to the particular needs in AI-enabled medical devices: (1) Consistency quantifies the variability of explanations to similar inputs; (2) plausibility estimates how close the explanation is to the ground truth; (3) fidelity assesses the alignment between the explanation and the model internal mechanisms; and (4) usefulness evaluates the impact on task performance of the explanation. Finally, we developed a scorecard for AI explainability methods in medical imaging that serves as a complete description and evaluation to accompany this type of device. We describe these four criteria and give examples on how they can be evaluated. As a case study, we use Ablation CAM and Eigen CAM to illustrate the evaluation of explanation heatmaps on the detection of breast lesions on synthetic mammographies. The first three criteria are evaluated for task-relevant scenarios. This framework establishes criteria through which the quality of explanations provided by medical devices can be quantified.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13010111
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
52.10
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Explainability: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable AI Features in Medical Imaging

Miguel A. Lago, Jana G. Delfino, Brandon Eich
1 citations
Bioengineering
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
52.10
article

Evaluating Explainability: A Framework for Systematic Assessment of Explainable AI Features in Medical Imaging

Miguel A. Lago, Jana G. Delfino, Brandon Eich
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Explainability features are intended to provide insight into the internal mechanisms of an Artificial Intelligence (AI) device, but there is a lack of evaluation techniques for assessing the quality of provided explanations. We propose a framework to assess and report explainable AI features in medical images. Our evaluation framework for AI explainability is based on four criteria that relate to the particular needs in AI-enabled medical devices: (1) Consistency quantifies the variability of explanations to similar inputs; (2) plausibility estimates how close the explanation is to the ground truth; (3) fidelity assesses the alignment between the explanation and the model internal mechanisms; and (4) usefulness evaluates the impact on task performance of the explanation. Finally, we developed a scorecard for AI explainability methods in medical imaging that serves as a complete description and evaluation to accompany this type of device. We describe these four criteria and give examples on how they can be evaluated. As a case study, we use Ablation CAM and Eigen CAM to illustrate the evaluation of explanation heatmaps on the detection of breast lesions on synthetic mammographies. The first three criteria are evaluated for task-relevant scenarios. This framework establishes criteria through which the quality of explanations provided by medical devices can be quantified.

BioengineeringVol. 13(1)
United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (US), Office of Science (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
52.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.