When to use machine learning? And which problems stand to benefit?

Abstract Despite the continued success of machine learning (ML), its indiscriminate use may not always yield the expected benefits, can waste resources, introduce unforeseen complexities, and even lead to failure. From this lens, this paper systematically addresses the following elemental questions: When should we integrate ML, and which problem-solving workflows benefit the most? Thus, this paper critically examines existing decision making frameworks and guidelines to identify their strengths and limitations in defining ML applicability. Then, through a comprehensive literature review and analysis, we outline explicit suitability criteria to assess when ML should be favored over traditional engineering methods. Based on this analysis, we propose a conceptual structured decision making framework that incorporates practical steps and checklists to guide engineers in method selection, model development, validation, and deployment. Additionally, this paper highlights critical challenges and potential future research questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Urban Lifeline
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44285-025-00054-3
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When to use machine learning? And which problems stand to benefit?

M. Z. Naser
Urban Lifeline
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
article

When to use machine learning? And which problems stand to benefit?

M. Z. Naser
article en

Abstract

Abstract Despite the continued success of machine learning (ML), its indiscriminate use may not always yield the expected benefits, can waste resources, introduce unforeseen complexities, and even lead to failure. From this lens, this paper systematically addresses the following elemental questions: When should we integrate ML, and which problem-solving workflows benefit the most? Thus, this paper critically examines existing decision making frameworks and guidelines to identify their strengths and limitations in defining ML applicability. Then, through a comprehensive literature review and analysis, we outline explicit suitability criteria to assess when ML should be favored over traditional engineering methods. Based on this analysis, we propose a conceptual structured decision making framework that incorporates practical steps and checklists to guide engineers in method selection, model development, validation, and deployment. Additionally, this paper highlights critical challenges and potential future research questions.

Urban LifelineVol. 4(1)
Clemson University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.