Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Craniofacial Surgery

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to enhance surgical care, with growing applications in craniofacial surgery, including automated cephalometric analysis, diagnostics for craniosynostosis, virtual surgical planning, perioperative decision support, and prediction of postoperative outcomes. As these technologies transition from experimental systems to clinical tools that influence diagnosis, planning, and counseling, the specialty faces increasingly complex ethical and regulatory challenges. In this manuscript, the authors review and synthesize the ethical principles guiding the responsible adoption of AI in craniofacial surgery, including informed consent in predominantly pediatric populations, the risks of algorithmic bias, the heightened privacy concerns associated with facial biometrics, the requirements for transparency and explainability, and the evolving concepts of clinician accountability in AI-augmented decision-making. The authors also examine the global regulatory landscape, focusing on the US FDA's framework for AI/ML-based software as a medical device (SaMD), the European Union's medical device and AI regulations, and international oversight models. The implications of continuous-learning systems for real-world performance monitoring and postmarket governance are discussed in detail. Finally, the authors propose a pragmatic implementation framework emphasizing governance structures, pilot evaluation, structured local validation, performance auditing, and equity-centered deployment. Establishing rigorous ethical guardrails, robust regulatory pathways, and specialty-specific governance structures will be essential for realizing AI's potential while safeguarding patient trust, safety, and equity in craniofacial care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012430
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
17.70
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Craniofacial Surgery

Berk B. Özmen, P. Taub
1 citations
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
17.70
article

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Craniofacial Surgery

Berk B. Özmen, P. Taub
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to enhance surgical care, with growing applications in craniofacial surgery, including automated cephalometric analysis, diagnostics for craniosynostosis, virtual surgical planning, perioperative decision support, and prediction of postoperative outcomes. As these technologies transition from experimental systems to clinical tools that influence diagnosis, planning, and counseling, the specialty faces increasingly complex ethical and regulatory challenges. In this manuscript, the authors review and synthesize the ethical principles guiding the responsible adoption of AI in craniofacial surgery, including informed consent in predominantly pediatric populations, the risks of algorithmic bias, the heightened privacy concerns associated with facial biometrics, the requirements for transparency and explainability, and the evolving concepts of clinician accountability in AI-augmented decision-making. The authors also examine the global regulatory landscape, focusing on the US FDA's framework for AI/ML-based software as a medical device (SaMD), the European Union's medical device and AI regulations, and international oversight models. The implications of continuous-learning systems for real-world performance monitoring and postmarket governance are discussed in detail. Finally, the authors propose a pragmatic implementation framework emphasizing governance structures, pilot evaluation, structured local validation, performance auditing, and equity-centered deployment. Establishing rigorous ethical guardrails, robust regulatory pathways, and specialty-specific governance structures will be essential for realizing AI's potential while safeguarding patient trust, safety, and equity in craniofacial care.

Journal of Craniofacial SurgeryVol. 37(3/4)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
17.70
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethical and Regulatory Considerations for Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Craniofacial Surgery — Berk B. Özmen, P. Taub · Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS