Genomic discrimination of the botanical groups conilon and robusta of Coffea canephora

The correct identification of Coffea canephora genotypes into the botanical groups Conilon, Robusta and their hybrids is fundamental for breeding strategies aimed at developing and selecting commercial clones; however, genotype discrimination is challenging when based only on morphological attributes. A total of 121 individuals were evaluated from the Incaper Active Germplasm Bank (BAG): 52 Conilon, 33 Robusta, and 36 hybrids (morphological intermediates showing traits of both groups). DArTseq™ SNPs were filtered, and 1,551 markers were used in the analyses. Cluster analyses revealed three genetic groups: one Robusta (G1) and two Conilon (G2 and G3). AMOVA indicated that 78.49% of the variation occurred among groups and 21.51% within groups. Differentiation was greatest between G1 and G3 (Fst = 0.77), followed by G1 and G2 (Fst = 0.46), whereas G2 and G3 showed lower differentiation (Fst = 0.31). G2 showed high genetic diversity and greater genotypic variability, with three SNP-defined genotypes, suggesting the presence of genetic hybrids. Ten SNPs, located on nine chromosomes and outside genic regions, were validated to discriminate the botanical groups, providing a molecular fingerprinting tool for the characterization of C. canephora germplasm in Brazil.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-35855-1
Primary Topic
Coffee research and impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genomic discrimination of the botanical groups conilon and robusta of Coffea canephora

Francine Alves Nogueira de Almeida, Rosana Gomes de Oliveira, M. V. L. da Silva, Iasmine Ramos Zaidan et al.
Scientific Reports
Coffee research and impacts
article

Genomic discrimination of the botanical groups conilon and robusta of Coffea canephora

Francine Alves Nogueira de Almeida, Rosana Gomes de Oliveira, M. V. L. da Silva, Iasmine Ramos Zaidan, João Felipe de Brites Senra, Adésio Ferreira, Marcia Flores da Silva Ferreira
article en

Abstract

The correct identification of Coffea canephora genotypes into the botanical groups Conilon, Robusta and their hybrids is fundamental for breeding strategies aimed at developing and selecting commercial clones; however, genotype discrimination is challenging when based only on morphological attributes. A total of 121 individuals were evaluated from the Incaper Active Germplasm Bank (BAG): 52 Conilon, 33 Robusta, and 36 hybrids (morphological intermediates showing traits of both groups). DArTseq™ SNPs were filtered, and 1,551 markers were used in the analyses. Cluster analyses revealed three genetic groups: one Robusta (G1) and two Conilon (G2 and G3). AMOVA indicated that 78.49% of the variation occurred among groups and 21.51% within groups. Differentiation was greatest between G1 and G3 (Fst = 0.77), followed by G1 and G2 (Fst = 0.46), whereas G2 and G3 showed lower differentiation (Fst = 0.31). G2 showed high genetic diversity and greater genotypic variability, with three SNP-defined genotypes, suggesting the presence of genetic hybrids. Ten SNPs, located on nine chromosomes and outside genic regions, were validated to discriminate the botanical groups, providing a molecular fingerprinting tool for the characterization of C. canephora germplasm in Brazil.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Instituto Capixaba de Pesquisa, Assistência Técnica e Extensão Rural (BR), Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Espírito Santo
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Coffee research and impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.