Performance Analysis of Cogeneration System Based on Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage

ABSTRACT To mitigate the volatility associated with renewable energy generation, energy storage technologies are essential for shifting energy across time and space by capturing surplus electricity and discharging it during deficits. This capability is vital for enhancing energy efficiency and facilitating the extensive integration of renewables. This study develops and evaluates two Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (AA‐CAES) configurations: a three‐stage compression/expansion system and a four‐stage counterpart, both designed for an 8‐h charge and 4‐h discharge cycle. Thermodynamic and economic models were constructed to assess their performance. The simulation indicates that the three‐stage system achieves a round‐trip efficiency (RTE) of 76.20% and an energy generation per unit volume (EGV) of 6.67 kWh/m 3 , leaving 207.88 tons of residual hot water. In comparison, the four‐stage system shows a slight decline in RTE by 1.23% and EGV by 0.41 kWh/m 3 , but generates a significantly higher surplus of hot water (increased by 171.82 tons). Economically, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is 0.1067 $/kWh for the three‐stage system and 0.1104 $/kWh for the four‐stage system, with dynamic payback periods (DPT) of 1.6 and 1.7 years, respectively. To address the substantial hot water surplus in the four‐stage design, an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) was integrated for waste heat recovery. This integration improved the system's work capacity, RTE, and EGV. Although the initial capital expenditure rose due to additional equipment, the slight dip in economic metrics is negligible compared to the thermodynamic gains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Storage
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/est2.70346
Primary Topic
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance Analysis of Cogeneration System Based on Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage

Chao Gao, Qinhao Kang, Kai Luo, Jing Chen et al.
Energy Storage
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
article

Performance Analysis of Cogeneration System Based on Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage

Chao Gao, Qinhao Kang, Kai Luo, Jing Chen, Jianhua Xue
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT To mitigate the volatility associated with renewable energy generation, energy storage technologies are essential for shifting energy across time and space by capturing surplus electricity and discharging it during deficits. This capability is vital for enhancing energy efficiency and facilitating the extensive integration of renewables. This study develops and evaluates two Advanced Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (AA‐CAES) configurations: a three‐stage compression/expansion system and a four‐stage counterpart, both designed for an 8‐h charge and 4‐h discharge cycle. Thermodynamic and economic models were constructed to assess their performance. The simulation indicates that the three‐stage system achieves a round‐trip efficiency (RTE) of 76.20% and an energy generation per unit volume (EGV) of 6.67 kWh/m 3 , leaving 207.88 tons of residual hot water. In comparison, the four‐stage system shows a slight decline in RTE by 1.23% and EGV by 0.41 kWh/m 3 , but generates a significantly higher surplus of hot water (increased by 171.82 tons). Economically, the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) is 0.1067 $/kWh for the three‐stage system and 0.1104 $/kWh for the four‐stage system, with dynamic payback periods (DPT) of 1.6 and 1.7 years, respectively. To address the substantial hot water surplus in the four‐stage design, an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) was integrated for waste heat recovery. This integration improved the system's work capacity, RTE, and EGV. Although the initial capital expenditure rose due to additional equipment, the slight dip in economic metrics is negligible compared to the thermodynamic gains.

Energy StorageVol. 8(1)
Energy Foundation (CN), China Datang Corporation (China) (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Thermodynamic and Exergetic Analyses of Power and Cooling Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.