AGN Feedback Models and AGN Demographics. I. Radio-mode AGN in EAGLE, SIMBA, and TNG100 Are Inconsistent with Observations

Abstract We compare predictions of how active galactic nuclei (AGNs) populate host galaxies at low redshifts to observations, finding large discrepancies between cosmological simulation predictions and observed patterns. Modern cosmological simulations include AGN feedback models tuned to reproduce the observed galaxy stellar mass function. However, due to a lack of real understanding of the physics of AGN feedback, these models vary significantly across simulations. To distinguish between the models and potentially test the underlying physics, we carry out independent tests of these models. In an earlier study, we found that F AGN —the observed completeness-corrected fraction of galaxies hosting radio AGNs with an Eddington ratio λ &gt; 10 −3 —to be a strong function of host-galaxy stellar mass ( M ⋆ ) but nearly independent of host specific star formation rates (sSFRs) at fixed M ⋆ . In this study, we test the radio mode AGN feedback models of the EAGLE, SIMBA, and TNG100 simulations by comparing their predictions of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AGN</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mfenced close=")" open="("> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⋆</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> to our observational constraint. We find that none of these simulations even qualitatively reproduce the observed dependencies of F AGN on M ⋆ and sSFR. Finally, we find that although the given TNG100 model could be modified in order to better reproduce the observed F AGN trend, this modification would likely also change its prediction for the local stellar mass function and star formation rates—key observations used for calibrating the simulation in the first place. Our findings highlight a pressing need to revisit the AGN feedback prescriptions in EAGLE, SIMBA, TNG100, and other similar models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ae2608
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AGN Feedback Models and AGN Demographics. I. Radio-mode AGN in EAGLE, SIMBA, and TNG100 Are Inconsistent with Observations

Douglas Rennehan, Arjun Suresh, Michael R. Blanton
The Astrophysical Journal
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

AGN Feedback Models and AGN Demographics. I. Radio-mode AGN in EAGLE, SIMBA, and TNG100 Are Inconsistent with Observations

Douglas Rennehan, Arjun Suresh, Michael R. Blanton
article en

Abstract

Abstract We compare predictions of how active galactic nuclei (AGNs) populate host galaxies at low redshifts to observations, finding large discrepancies between cosmological simulation predictions and observed patterns. Modern cosmological simulations include AGN feedback models tuned to reproduce the observed galaxy stellar mass function. However, due to a lack of real understanding of the physics of AGN feedback, these models vary significantly across simulations. To distinguish between the models and potentially test the underlying physics, we carry out independent tests of these models. In an earlier study, we found that F AGN —the observed completeness-corrected fraction of galaxies hosting radio AGNs with an Eddington ratio λ &gt; 10 −3 —to be a strong function of host-galaxy stellar mass ( M ⋆ ) but nearly independent of host specific star formation rates (sSFRs) at fixed M ⋆ . In this study, we test the radio mode AGN feedback models of the EAGLE, SIMBA, and TNG100 simulations by comparing their predictions of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>F</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AGN</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> <mml:mfenced close=")" open="("> <mml:mrow> <mml:msub> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>⋆</mml:mo> </mml:mrow> </mml:msub> </mml:mrow> </mml:mfenced> </mml:math> to our observational constraint. We find that none of these simulations even qualitatively reproduce the observed dependencies of F AGN on M ⋆ and sSFR. Finally, we find that although the given TNG100 model could be modified in order to better reproduce the observed F AGN trend, this modification would likely also change its prediction for the local stellar mass function and star formation rates—key observations used for calibrating the simulation in the first place. Our findings highlight a pressing need to revisit the AGN feedback prescriptions in EAGLE, SIMBA, TNG100, and other similar models.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 997(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.