Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction Using Allografts as the ACL Graft Source Reduces Surgical Failure and Improves Graft Maturity Compared with Isolated ACL Reconstruction

<b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to perform matched comparisons of the surgical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction with those of isolated ACL reconstruction, in which allografts were used for the ACL. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction with or without additional ALL reconstruction between 2017 and 2023 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included and grouped according to whether an additional ALL reconstruction was performed. The cohorts were statistically adjusted using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to control for potential confounders related to surgical indication, including age, activity level, sex, rotational knee laxity, and preoperative osteoarthritic grade. Between-group comparisons were conducted for baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, knee laxity, and radiologic parameters. <b>Results:</b> Fifty-nine patients were included (Group 1: 39 isolated ACL reconstructions; Group 2: 20 combined ACL and ALL reconstructions). Before IPTW adjustment, a significant difference was observed in the preoperative pivot-shift test (<i>p</i> = 0.008), which was no longer significant after weighting. Postoperative functional outcomes and knee stability were comparable between groups; however, the incidence of surgical failure was significantly lower in Group 2 both before and after IPTW adjustment (<i>p</i> = 0.044 and <i>p</i> = 0.049, respectively). Regarding radiologic parameters, the signal-to-noise quotient of the ACL graft was also significantly lower in Group 2, both before and after IPTW adjustment (<i>p</i> = 0.046 and <i>p</i> = 0.038, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> In ACL reconstruction using allografts, the addition of ALL reconstruction resulted in more favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes-particularly a lower incidence of surgical failure and greater postoperative graft maturity-compared with isolated ACL reconstruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020735
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction Using Allografts as the ACL Graft Source Reduces Surgical Failure and Improves Graft Maturity Compared with Isolated ACL Reconstruction

Sung-Hwan Kim, J. H. Cho, Hyun-Soo Moon, Se-Han Jung et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Combined ACL and ALL Reconstruction Using Allografts as the ACL Graft Source Reduces Surgical Failure and Improves Graft Maturity Compared with Isolated ACL Reconstruction

Sung-Hwan Kim, J. H. Cho, Hyun-Soo Moon, Se-Han Jung, Gyunghyun Shin, Kwangho Chung, Sungjun Kim, Min Jung
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to perform matched comparisons of the surgical outcomes of combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction with those of isolated ACL reconstruction, in which allografts were used for the ACL. <b>Methods:</b> Patients who underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction with or without additional ALL reconstruction between 2017 and 2023 and had a minimum follow-up of 2 years were included and grouped according to whether an additional ALL reconstruction was performed. The cohorts were statistically adjusted using an inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to control for potential confounders related to surgical indication, including age, activity level, sex, rotational knee laxity, and preoperative osteoarthritic grade. Between-group comparisons were conducted for baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, knee laxity, and radiologic parameters. <b>Results:</b> Fifty-nine patients were included (Group 1: 39 isolated ACL reconstructions; Group 2: 20 combined ACL and ALL reconstructions). Before IPTW adjustment, a significant difference was observed in the preoperative pivot-shift test (<i>p</i> = 0.008), which was no longer significant after weighting. Postoperative functional outcomes and knee stability were comparable between groups; however, the incidence of surgical failure was significantly lower in Group 2 both before and after IPTW adjustment (<i>p</i> = 0.044 and <i>p</i> = 0.049, respectively). Regarding radiologic parameters, the signal-to-noise quotient of the ACL graft was also significantly lower in Group 2, both before and after IPTW adjustment (<i>p</i> = 0.046 and <i>p</i> = 0.038, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> In ACL reconstruction using allografts, the addition of ALL reconstruction resulted in more favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes-particularly a lower incidence of surgical failure and greater postoperative graft maturity-compared with isolated ACL reconstruction.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Yonsei University (KR), Severance Hospital (KR), Gangnam Severance Hospital (KR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.