Construction and Optimization of Ecological Network Based on SOM and XGBoost-SHAP: A Case Study of the Zhengzhou–Kaifeng–Luoyang Region

The ecological network serves as a vital spatial strategy for addressing climate change, biodiversity loss, and habitat fragmentation. Addressing limitations in existing ecological network studies—such as strong subjectivity and insufficient accuracy in structural element identification, cross-regional integration, and resistance surface weighting—this research uses the Zhengzhou–Kaifeng–Luoyang region (ZKLR) as a case study. It introduces the self-organizing map (SOM) model to identify ecological sources and employs the XGBoost-SHAP model to optimize resistance surface weights, thereby reducing subjective weighting biases. Subsequently, the Linkage Mapper tool is utilized to construct the regional ecological network. The superiority of the SOM model for identifying ecological sources was confirmed by comparison with a traditional network based on morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA). Further integrating complex network topology theory, nodes attack the simulations-assessed network resilience and proposed optimization strategies. The results indicate the following: (1) The area of ecological sources identified by the SOM model is three times that of the MSPA model; (2) SHAP feature importance analysis revealed that elevation (DEM) exerted the greatest influence on the composite resistance surface, contributing over 40%, followed by land use and slope, with each contributing approximately 15%. High-resistance areas were primarily distributed in western and central mountainous regions and built-up urban areas, while low-resistance areas were concentrated in the central and eastern plains; (3) topological analysis indicates that the integrated ecological network (IEN) exhibits superior robustness compared to the structural ecological network (SEN). The edge-adding strategy generated 22 additional ecological corridors, significantly enhancing the overall resilience of the integrated ecological network; and (4) based on ecological network construction and optimization results, a territorial spatial protection strategy of “one belt, two cores, two zones, and three corridors” is proposed. This study provides a novel methodological framework for ecological network construction, with findings offering reference for ecological conservation and spatial planning in the ZKLR and similar areas.