Use of AI-assisted writing tools for student self-assessment at school: survey on teachers’ perceptions and practices

Writing is a complex, learned skill that requires continuous practice and support. Digital technologies, and more recently AI-assisted writing tools, have been introduced to enhance students’ writing and self-assessment, with potential benefits for motivation, accuracy, and collaboration. Their effectiveness, however, depends on how they are integrated into educational contexts and on teachers’ perceptions. This exploratory study, conducted between February and April 2025 with n. 1,072 pre-service teachers enrolled in qualification programs in Italy, examines perceptions and practices related to AI-assisted writing tools for student self-assessment. In this study, the construct was operationalised through a restricted set of widely used AI-based generative writing tools available at the time of data collection. Adopting a mixed embedded design that combines quantitative and qualitative analyses, the research found that most teachers expressed cautious or sceptical views about their general usefulness, yet more positive attitudes emerged toward specific tools (e.g., ChatGPT) and sub-skills, especially spelling and text composition. Qualitative data indicated that teachers who experimented with such tools perceived benefits for student motivation, engagement, and skill development, though concerns persisted regarding critical thinking and over-reliance on algorithms. The findings underscore the need for targeted teacher training and further research to support the effective pedagogical integration of AI-assisted tools in writing instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1701597
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Use of AI-assisted writing tools for student self-assessment at school: survey on teachers’ perceptions and practices

Laura Sara Agrati, Viviana Vinci, Arianna Beri, Pierangelo Berardi
Frontiers in Education
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Use of AI-assisted writing tools for student self-assessment at school: survey on teachers’ perceptions and practices

Laura Sara Agrati, Viviana Vinci, Arianna Beri, Pierangelo Berardi
article en

Abstract

Writing is a complex, learned skill that requires continuous practice and support. Digital technologies, and more recently AI-assisted writing tools, have been introduced to enhance students’ writing and self-assessment, with potential benefits for motivation, accuracy, and collaboration. Their effectiveness, however, depends on how they are integrated into educational contexts and on teachers’ perceptions. This exploratory study, conducted between February and April 2025 with n. 1,072 pre-service teachers enrolled in qualification programs in Italy, examines perceptions and practices related to AI-assisted writing tools for student self-assessment. In this study, the construct was operationalised through a restricted set of widely used AI-based generative writing tools available at the time of data collection. Adopting a mixed embedded design that combines quantitative and qualitative analyses, the research found that most teachers expressed cautious or sceptical views about their general usefulness, yet more positive attitudes emerged toward specific tools (e.g., ChatGPT) and sub-skills, especially spelling and text composition. Qualitative data indicated that teachers who experimented with such tools perceived benefits for student motivation, engagement, and skill development, though concerns persisted regarding critical thinking and over-reliance on algorithms. The findings underscore the need for targeted teacher training and further research to support the effective pedagogical integration of AI-assisted tools in writing instruction.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 11
University of Bergamo (IT), Department of Cultural Heritage (LT), Pegaso University (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.