Risk Factors for Failure of Separated Instrument Removal: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the risk factors associated with the failure of separated instrument removal. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies reporting on the success rates of separated instrument removal, covering the period from 1988 to 2025. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0. Seven studies encompassing 922 patients with separated instruments were included. The pooled success rate of separated instrument removal was 66%. Meta-analysis identified several significant risk factors for removal failure: instrument location in posterior teeth, mandibular teeth, the apical third of the canal, the apical side of a curved canal, and root curvature exceeding 30°. Current evidence indicates that unfavourable anatomical factors significantly increase the likelihood of failed instrument retrieval. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative assessment and careful case selection when planning separated instrument removal procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Endodontic Journal
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.70058
Primary Topic
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk Factors for Failure of Separated Instrument Removal: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Le Zhao, Yang Liu, WanNing Yu, WangYu Luo et al.
Australian Endodontic Journal
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
article

Risk Factors for Failure of Separated Instrument Removal: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

Le Zhao, Yang Liu, WanNing Yu, WangYu Luo, Yue Shen, Xiaolei Zhang
article en

Abstract

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the risk factors associated with the failure of separated instrument removal. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library was performed to identify studies reporting on the success rates of separated instrument removal, covering the period from 1988 to 2025. The meta-analysis was performed using Stata 17.0. Seven studies encompassing 922 patients with separated instruments were included. The pooled success rate of separated instrument removal was 66%. Meta-analysis identified several significant risk factors for removal failure: instrument location in posterior teeth, mandibular teeth, the apical third of the canal, the apical side of a curved canal, and root curvature exceeding 30°. Current evidence indicates that unfavourable anatomical factors significantly increase the likelihood of failed instrument retrieval. These findings underscore the importance of preoperative assessment and careful case selection when planning separated instrument removal procedures.

Australian Endodontic Journal
Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Eighth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Endodontics and Root Canal Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.