Re-Enchanting American History

Around the world, citizens and leaders seek to realign collective identities with political boundaries. These aspirations are reshaping the ways we discuss—and divide over—US history. This article asks whether the history discipline is prepared to respond to the changes taking place around us, including the revival of nationalism. Professional historians use three dominant paradigms to narrate the history of the United States: post-American, hyper-American, and mainstream. Too often, analyses tend to fuel rather than explain today’s history culture wars. This article avoids judging the comparative worth of the three paradigms, focusing instead on analyzing seriously the ideas and aspirations of progressive, conservative, and mainstream scholars. The goal is to help scholars in each camp understand the deeper ideas animating their disagreements. This article both surveys the state of the field and offers guidance to academic and public historians as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Historical Studies
Published
2025-09-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/737700
Primary Topic
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Re-Enchanting American History

Johann N. Neem
Critical Historical Studies
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
article

Re-Enchanting American History

Johann N. Neem
article en

Abstract

Around the world, citizens and leaders seek to realign collective identities with political boundaries. These aspirations are reshaping the ways we discuss—and divide over—US history. This article asks whether the history discipline is prepared to respond to the changes taking place around us, including the revival of nationalism. Professional historians use three dominant paradigms to narrate the history of the United States: post-American, hyper-American, and mainstream. Too often, analyses tend to fuel rather than explain today’s history culture wars. This article avoids judging the comparative worth of the three paradigms, focusing instead on analyzing seriously the ideas and aspirations of progressive, conservative, and mainstream scholars. The goal is to help scholars in each camp understand the deeper ideas animating their disagreements. This article both surveys the state of the field and offers guidance to academic and public historians as the United States approaches its 250th anniversary.

Critical Historical StudiesVol. 12(2)
Western Washington University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Philosophy, History, and Historiography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.