Aligning Artificial Intelligence Prediction Targets with Clinical Workflows Using Human Centered Design Methods

Artificial intelligence models in healthcare often fail to improve patient outcomes despite strong predictive performance because they are frequently developed with limited understanding of clinical workflows and system implementation. We demonstrate a human-centered design approach to define prediction targets before model development, ensuring alignment with actionable clinical interventions. Using pediatric acute kidney injury as a case study, we convened a multidisciplinary working group and applied three complementary methods: user stories to elicit role-specific prediction targets, a People, Environment, Technology, and Tasks (PETT) Scan to analyze sociotechnical system factors, and process mapping to identify workflow leverage points. This approach revealed that different clinical roles require distinct prediction targets, with shared barriers including inadequate monitoring practices, poor visibility of at-risk patients, and unclear trajectories for kidney injury progression. By integrating clinical context before algorithm development, we identified high-impact prediction targets that support actionable interventions for hospitalists, nephrologists, and intensivists, demonstrating how human-centered design can bridge technical model performance and real-world clinical utility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.15.26344209
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aligning Artificial Intelligence Prediction Targets with Clinical Workflows Using Human Centered Design Methods

Naveen Muthu, Andrea McCarter, Mark Mai, Nikolay Braykov et al.
medRxiv
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Aligning Artificial Intelligence Prediction Targets with Clinical Workflows Using Human Centered Design Methods

Naveen Muthu, Andrea McCarter, Mark Mai, Nikolay Braykov, Evan Orenstein, Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Jordan Hilsman, Xiao Hu, H. Stella Shin
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence models in healthcare often fail to improve patient outcomes despite strong predictive performance because they are frequently developed with limited understanding of clinical workflows and system implementation. We demonstrate a human-centered design approach to define prediction targets before model development, ensuring alignment with actionable clinical interventions. Using pediatric acute kidney injury as a case study, we convened a multidisciplinary working group and applied three complementary methods: user stories to elicit role-specific prediction targets, a People, Environment, Technology, and Tasks (PETT) Scan to analyze sociotechnical system factors, and process mapping to identify workflow leverage points. This approach revealed that different clinical roles require distinct prediction targets, with shared barriers including inadequate monitoring practices, poor visibility of at-risk patients, and unclear trajectories for kidney injury progression. By integrating clinical context before algorithm development, we identified high-impact prediction targets that support actionable interventions for hospitalists, nephrologists, and intensivists, demonstrating how human-centered design can bridge technical model performance and real-world clinical utility.

medRxiv
Emory University (US), Woodruff Health Sciences Center (US), Children's Healthcare of Atlanta (US)
National Institutes of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.