Global stability and strength of high-strength aluminium alloy T-section columns

High-strength aluminium alloys have found increasing applications in structural engineering due to their superior mechanical characteristics and outstanding durability against corrosion. However, research on the stability and design of aluminium monosymmetric section columns remains limited. To fill the research gap, the present study integrates experimental and numerical approaches to examine the buckling behaviour and performance of high-strength aluminium T-section columns. In the experimental programme, material tests, measurements of geometric imperfections and fixed-ended column tests were performed. Subsequently, numerical models were established and validated against test results, enabling parametric investigations across a wider scope of section geometries and specimen lengths. Based on experimental and parametric data, the reliability of the design rules in existing design codes for aluminium columns – including Eurocode and American Specification – was assessed. As a supplement, the applicability of the Direct Strength Method prescribed in the American Specification for cold-formed steel structures was also assessed. The results revealed that: (i) both the European and American aluminium design standards provide accurate and consistent resistance predictions for columns failing by flexural buckling; however, their predictions for flexural–torsional buckling exhibit greater scatter and tend to be conservative by up to 32%; (ii) the accuracy and consistency of Eurocode predictions are sensitive to local buckling interaction, for both flexural and flexural–torsional failure modes; (iii) the codified Direct Strength Method for cold-formed steel structures demonstrates the most accurate failure load predictions irrespective of failure mode, remaining overall conservative by about 12%, thereby demonstrating its applicability to the design of high-strength aluminium T-section columns. • Flexural–torsional and flexural buckling behaviour of high-strength aluminium T-section columns was studied. • Global and local interactive buckling behaviour was investigated. • Tests were conducted on 12 high-strength aluminium alloy T-section column specimens. • FE models were validated against test results and then used for parametric studies. • Codified design rules were assessed based on test and FE data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Engineering Structures
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2026.122154
Primary Topic
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Global stability and strength of high-strength aluminium alloy T-section columns

Andi Su, Ke Jiang, Yuanwen Ouyang, Yue Yang et al.
Engineering Structures
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
article

Global stability and strength of high-strength aluminium alloy T-section columns

Andi Su, Ke Jiang, Yuanwen Ouyang, Yue Yang, Binxu Li
article en

Abstract

High-strength aluminium alloys have found increasing applications in structural engineering due to their superior mechanical characteristics and outstanding durability against corrosion. However, research on the stability and design of aluminium monosymmetric section columns remains limited. To fill the research gap, the present study integrates experimental and numerical approaches to examine the buckling behaviour and performance of high-strength aluminium T-section columns. In the experimental programme, material tests, measurements of geometric imperfections and fixed-ended column tests were performed. Subsequently, numerical models were established and validated against test results, enabling parametric investigations across a wider scope of section geometries and specimen lengths. Based on experimental and parametric data, the reliability of the design rules in existing design codes for aluminium columns – including Eurocode and American Specification – was assessed. As a supplement, the applicability of the Direct Strength Method prescribed in the American Specification for cold-formed steel structures was also assessed. The results revealed that: (i) both the European and American aluminium design standards provide accurate and consistent resistance predictions for columns failing by flexural buckling; however, their predictions for flexural–torsional buckling exhibit greater scatter and tend to be conservative by up to 32%; (ii) the accuracy and consistency of Eurocode predictions are sensitive to local buckling interaction, for both flexural and flexural–torsional failure modes; (iii) the codified Direct Strength Method for cold-formed steel structures demonstrates the most accurate failure load predictions irrespective of failure mode, remaining overall conservative by about 12%, thereby demonstrating its applicability to the design of high-strength aluminium T-section columns. • Flexural–torsional and flexural buckling behaviour of high-strength aluminium T-section columns was studied. • Global and local interactive buckling behaviour was investigated. • Tests were conducted on 12 high-strength aluminium alloy T-section column specimens. • FE models were validated against test results and then used for parametric studies. • Codified design rules were assessed based on test and FE data.

Engineering StructuresVol. 352
University of Canterbury (NZ), Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Luxfer Group (United Kingdom) (GB), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.