Endostar combined with docetaxel or cisplatin in the management of malignant ascites through hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A retrospective cohort study

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are a prevalent and treatment-resistant form of recurrence in patients with abdominal tumors. The present study retrospectively examined the clinical performance and potential adverse effects of combining Endostar with docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating malignant ascites (MA). Subjects diagnosed with malignancies confirmed by ascites cell block results and clinical presentations were included within the study, constituting a total of 48 MA cases. The docetaxel group (n=25) was treated with Endostar combined with docetaxel for two cycles. The cisplatin group (n=23) was treated with Endostar combined with cisplatin for two cycles. The objective response rate (ORR; defined as CR + PR), disease control rate (DCR; defined as CR + PR + SD), ascites control time, improvement rate of the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and incidence of major adverse reactions were statistically analyzed. There were no significant differences in the ORR (64.0 vs. 56.5%), DCR (92.0 vs. 91.3%), improvement rate of KPS (48.0 vs. 43.5%) or ascites control time (55 vs. 46 days) between the docetaxel and cisplatin groups (all P>0.05). Renal function impairment developed in 7 patients (30.4%) in the cisplatin group compared with 1 patient (4.0%) in the docetaxel group (P<0.05). Except for renal injury and blood pressure, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of other adverse reactions or treatment-related deaths between the two groups. Overall, the combined application of Endostar and docetaxel/cisplatin HIPEC yielded promising clinical outcomes in the treatment of MA, as indicated by high ORRs and DCRs, significantly improving the quality of life for affected individuals. However, it is worth noting that the incidence of nephrotoxicity was higher in the cisplatin treatment group compared with that in the docetaxel treatment group. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious about nephrotoxicity when administering cisplatin in high-risk patients with PM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oncology Letters
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2026.15463
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endostar combined with docetaxel or cisplatin in the management of malignant ascites through hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A retrospective cohort study

Qian Jin, Ying Zhou, Jing Wu, Yajun Wu et al.
Oncology Letters
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
article

Endostar combined with docetaxel or cisplatin in the management of malignant ascites through hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A retrospective cohort study

Qian Jin, Ying Zhou, Jing Wu, Yajun Wu, Dashan Yin
article en

Abstract

Peritoneal metastases (PM) are a prevalent and treatment-resistant form of recurrence in patients with abdominal tumors. The present study retrospectively examined the clinical performance and potential adverse effects of combining Endostar with docetaxel/cisplatin chemotherapeutic hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for treating malignant ascites (MA). Subjects diagnosed with malignancies confirmed by ascites cell block results and clinical presentations were included within the study, constituting a total of 48 MA cases. The docetaxel group (n=25) was treated with Endostar combined with docetaxel for two cycles. The cisplatin group (n=23) was treated with Endostar combined with cisplatin for two cycles. The objective response rate (ORR; defined as CR + PR), disease control rate (DCR; defined as CR + PR + SD), ascites control time, improvement rate of the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and incidence of major adverse reactions were statistically analyzed. There were no significant differences in the ORR (64.0 vs. 56.5%), DCR (92.0 vs. 91.3%), improvement rate of KPS (48.0 vs. 43.5%) or ascites control time (55 vs. 46 days) between the docetaxel and cisplatin groups (all P>0.05). Renal function impairment developed in 7 patients (30.4%) in the cisplatin group compared with 1 patient (4.0%) in the docetaxel group (P<0.05). Except for renal injury and blood pressure, there were no statistically significant differences in the incidences of other adverse reactions or treatment-related deaths between the two groups. Overall, the combined application of Endostar and docetaxel/cisplatin HIPEC yielded promising clinical outcomes in the treatment of MA, as indicated by high ORRs and DCRs, significantly improving the quality of life for affected individuals. However, it is worth noting that the incidence of nephrotoxicity was higher in the cisplatin treatment group compared with that in the docetaxel treatment group. Therefore, clinicians should be cautious about nephrotoxicity when administering cisplatin in high-risk patients with PM.

Oncology LettersVol. 31(3)
Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (CN), Zhejiang Hospital (CN), Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Zhejiang University (CN)
Medical Science and Technology Project of Zhejiang Province, Science and Technology Program of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.