Optimal Hybrid Energy System Sizing for Green Hydrogen Production: Scenario-Based Techno-Economic Approach

This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic assessment to optimize a hybrid renewable energy system for green hydrogen production in Jordan. Using the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewables (HOMERs) and System Advisor Model (SAM) software, this study evaluates multiple cost projections for 2030 technology costs. Key parameters such as capital cost, efficiency, and lifetime are varied extensively. Highlighted results show a wide range in the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH), reaching 1.59 to 3.49 USD/kg, and the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) from 0.0072 to 0.0301 USD/kWh. Furthermore, Net Present Value (NPV) spans from USD 424 to 927 million, depending on the scenario and sensitivity case. Technically, the system’s optimized capacities vary significantly. PV ranges from 203 to 457 MW, wind capacities range from 0 to 220 MW, and electrolyzers range from 192 to 346 MW, demonstrating the flexibility required to meet different cost and performance assumptions. The study’s broad relevance extends to developing countries with grid constraints, where off-grid green hydrogen production is feasible. Its framework can be adapted globally, offering valuable insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hydrogen
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/hydrogen7010012
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.60

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Hybrid Energy System Sizing for Green Hydrogen Production: Scenario-Based Techno-Economic Approach

Anas Abuzayed, Ahmad Abuyahya, Eyad A. Feilat
2 citations
Hydrogen
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
19.60
article

Optimal Hybrid Energy System Sizing for Green Hydrogen Production: Scenario-Based Techno-Economic Approach

Anas Abuzayed, Ahmad Abuyahya, Eyad A. Feilat
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive techno-economic assessment to optimize a hybrid renewable energy system for green hydrogen production in Jordan. Using the Hybrid Optimization Model for Electric Renewables (HOMERs) and System Advisor Model (SAM) software, this study evaluates multiple cost projections for 2030 technology costs. Key parameters such as capital cost, efficiency, and lifetime are varied extensively. Highlighted results show a wide range in the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH), reaching 1.59 to 3.49 USD/kg, and the Levelized Cost of Energy (LCOE) from 0.0072 to 0.0301 USD/kWh. Furthermore, Net Present Value (NPV) spans from USD 424 to 927 million, depending on the scenario and sensitivity case. Technically, the system’s optimized capacities vary significantly. PV ranges from 203 to 457 MW, wind capacities range from 0 to 220 MW, and electrolyzers range from 192 to 346 MW, demonstrating the flexibility required to meet different cost and performance assumptions. The study’s broad relevance extends to developing countries with grid constraints, where off-grid green hydrogen production is feasible. Its framework can be adapted globally, offering valuable insights.

HydrogenVol. 7(1)
University of Jordan (JO), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Bridge University (SS)
University of Jordan
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems
19.60
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Optimal Hybrid Energy System Sizing for Green Hydrogen Production: Scenario-Based Techno-Economic Approach — Anas Abuzayed, Ahmad Abuyahya, et al. · Hydrogen (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS