Why Zero False Negatives Matter in Quantum Computing

Most quantum error mitigation and correction strategies prioritize reducing overall error rates, typically optimizing for average fidelity or minimizing false positives. In this work, we argue that zero false negatives (ZFN)—the guarantee that no physically admissible quantum state is ever prematurely discarded—represent a more fundamental and under explored design principle in quantum computing architectures. We propose that early-stage, geometry-based pre-filters, such as the GIGL snap-to-grid framework, can serve as deterministic error prevention layers that preserve unitarity and computational completeness while dramatically reducing down stream complexity. This work reframes quantum error control as a structural filtering problem, not merely a probabilistic one. A simple Monte Carlo toy model and independent analytical assessments are presented to illustrate the principle.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18268653
Primary Topic
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Zero False Negatives Matter in Quantum Computing

tak chung terence yeung
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
article

Why Zero False Negatives Matter in Quantum Computing

tak chung terence yeung
article en

Abstract

Most quantum error mitigation and correction strategies prioritize reducing overall error rates, typically optimizing for average fidelity or minimizing false positives. In this work, we argue that zero false negatives (ZFN)—the guarantee that no physically admissible quantum state is ever prematurely discarded—represent a more fundamental and under explored design principle in quantum computing architectures. We propose that early-stage, geometry-based pre-filters, such as the GIGL snap-to-grid framework, can serve as deterministic error prevention layers that preserve unitarity and computational completeness while dramatically reducing down stream complexity. This work reframes quantum error control as a structural filtering problem, not merely a probabilistic one. A simple Monte Carlo toy model and independent analytical assessments are presented to illustrate the principle.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.