Valuation of New Carbon Asset CCER

As a critical carbon offset mechanism, China’s Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) plays a pivotal role in achieving the “dual carbon” targets. With the relaunch of its trading market, refining the CCER valuation framework has become imperative. This study develops a multidimensional CCER valuation methodology based on both the income and market approaches. Under the income approach, two probabilistic models—discrete and continuous emission distribution frameworks—are proposed to quantify CCER value. Under the market approach, a Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) model and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network model are constructed to capture nonlinear temporal dynamics in CCER pricing. Through a systematic comparative analysis of the outputs and methodologies of these models, this study identifies optimal pricing strategies to enhance CCER valuation. Results reveal significant disparities among models in predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to market dynamics. Each model exhibits distinct strengths and limitations, necessitating scenario-specific selection based on data availability, application context, and timeliness requirements to strike a balance between precision and efficiency. These findings offer both theoretical and practical insights to support the development of the CCER market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainability
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/su18020940
Primary Topic
Climate Change Policy and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Valuation of New Carbon Asset CCER

Jiayi Wang, H. L. Li, Boyan Zou, Yue Liu et al.
Sustainability
Climate Change Policy and Economics
article

Valuation of New Carbon Asset CCER

Jiayi Wang, H. L. Li, Boyan Zou, Yue Liu, Hua Tang
article en

Abstract

As a critical carbon offset mechanism, China’s Certified Emission Reduction (CCER) plays a pivotal role in achieving the “dual carbon” targets. With the relaunch of its trading market, refining the CCER valuation framework has become imperative. This study develops a multidimensional CCER valuation methodology based on both the income and market approaches. Under the income approach, two probabilistic models—discrete and continuous emission distribution frameworks—are proposed to quantify CCER value. Under the market approach, a Geometric Brownian Motion (GBM) model and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network model are constructed to capture nonlinear temporal dynamics in CCER pricing. Through a systematic comparative analysis of the outputs and methodologies of these models, this study identifies optimal pricing strategies to enhance CCER valuation. Results reveal significant disparities among models in predictive accuracy, computational efficiency, and adaptability to market dynamics. Each model exhibits distinct strengths and limitations, necessitating scenario-specific selection based on data availability, application context, and timeliness requirements to strike a balance between precision and efficiency. These findings offer both theoretical and practical insights to support the development of the CCER market.

SustainabilityVol. 18(2)
Jiangsu University (CN), Wenzhou University (CN), Lingnan Normal University (CN), University of Toronto (CA), Zhanjiang Experimental Station (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Climate Change Policy and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Valuation of New Carbon Asset CCER — Jiayi Wang, H. L. Li, et al. · Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS