Parental Criminalization and the Overrepresentation of Black Families in Child Protective Services: The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act

Abstract Racial disparities within child protective services are widely known. However, little is known about how the language used in historical policy documents related to the passing of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 1974 ultimately criminalized parents along racialized, gendered, and class-based lines. Using intersectionality and stigma as the frameworks and critical discourse analysis as the methodology, the authors analyzed the language and identified four themes which aided in the later criminalization of parents: 1) egregious examples of child abuse, 2) racialized dimensions of parental criminality, 3) gendered dimensions of parental criminality, and 4) class-based dimensions of parental criminality. It is crucial to understand how the first federal child protective services policy in the United States utilized coded and biased language to criminalize parents along racialized, gendered, and class-based notions of inadequate parenting. Implications of how this language later led to the overrepresentation of Black families within child protective services are explored.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Race and Social Problems
Published
2026-01-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12552-026-09491-3
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parental Criminalization and the Overrepresentation of Black Families in Child Protective Services: The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act

Gwendolyn D. Fowler, Kate Golden Guzman, María Gandarilla Ocampo, Alicia Mendez et al.
Race and Social Problems
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Parental Criminalization and the Overrepresentation of Black Families in Child Protective Services: The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act

Gwendolyn D. Fowler, Kate Golden Guzman, María Gandarilla Ocampo, Alicia Mendez, Shari Cunningham, Abigail Williams-Butler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Racial disparities within child protective services are widely known. However, little is known about how the language used in historical policy documents related to the passing of the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 1974 ultimately criminalized parents along racialized, gendered, and class-based lines. Using intersectionality and stigma as the frameworks and critical discourse analysis as the methodology, the authors analyzed the language and identified four themes which aided in the later criminalization of parents: 1) egregious examples of child abuse, 2) racialized dimensions of parental criminality, 3) gendered dimensions of parental criminality, and 4) class-based dimensions of parental criminality. It is crucial to understand how the first federal child protective services policy in the United States utilized coded and biased language to criminalize parents along racialized, gendered, and class-based notions of inadequate parenting. Implications of how this language later led to the overrepresentation of Black families within child protective services are explored.

Race and Social ProblemsVol. 18(1)
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), West Chester University (US), Bridgewater State University (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.