Beyond Access: Rethinking Refugee Integration through Information Systems

This paper investigates how public information systems (IS) in Finland mediate the integration of refugees, focusing on trauma-informed design and infrastructural coordination. Drawing on 40 interviews with stakeholders across governmental, municipal, and NGO sectors, we examine how IS—ranging from residency platforms to AI-based support tools—enable or constrain access to essential services. Our findings reveal gaps in interoperability, language accessibility, and emotional responsiveness, which hinder equitable digital participation. Refugees often experience trauma-related cognitive burdens that reduce trust and usability, challenging assumptions of rational IS adoption. We extend digital divide theory by incorporating trauma-informed design principles and propose practical guidelines for building inclusive, secure, and emotionally attuned digital infrastructures. The paper contributes to IS research by theorizing the socio-technical complexities of public infrastructure in humanitarian settings, offering insights for designing systems that are not only efficient but just, usersensitive, and capable of fostering integration, dignity, and resilience for displaced populations.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
LUTPub (LUT University)
Published
2025-12-14
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Access: Rethinking Refugee Integration through Information Systems

Dominik Siemon, Olena Ocheredko
LUTPub (LUT University)
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Beyond Access: Rethinking Refugee Integration through Information Systems

Dominik Siemon, Olena Ocheredko
article en

Abstract

This paper investigates how public information systems (IS) in Finland mediate the integration of refugees, focusing on trauma-informed design and infrastructural coordination. Drawing on 40 interviews with stakeholders across governmental, municipal, and NGO sectors, we examine how IS—ranging from residency platforms to AI-based support tools—enable or constrain access to essential services. Our findings reveal gaps in interoperability, language accessibility, and emotional responsiveness, which hinder equitable digital participation. Refugees often experience trauma-related cognitive burdens that reduce trust and usability, challenging assumptions of rational IS adoption. We extend digital divide theory by incorporating trauma-informed design principles and propose practical guidelines for building inclusive, secure, and emotionally attuned digital infrastructures. The paper contributes to IS research by theorizing the socio-technical complexities of public infrastructure in humanitarian settings, offering insights for designing systems that are not only efficient but just, usersensitive, and capable of fostering integration, dignity, and resilience for displaced populations.

LUTPub (LUT University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Beyond Access: Rethinking Refugee Integration through Information Systems — Dominik Siemon, Olena Ocheredko · LUTPub (LUT University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS