Probabilistic Wind Speed Forecasting Under at Site and Regional Frameworks: A Comparative Evaluation of BART, GPR, and QRF

Reliable probabilistic wind speed forecasts are essential for integrating renewable energy into power grids and managing operational uncertainty. This study compares Quantile Regression Forests (QRF), Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) under at-site and regional pooled frameworks using 21 years (2000–2020) of daily wind data from eleven stations in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Models are evaluated via strict year-based holdout validation across seven metrics: RMSE, MAE, R2, bias, correlation, coverage, and Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS). Regional QRF achieves exceptional point forecast stability with minimal RMSE increase but suffers persistent under-coverage, rendering probabilistic bounds unreliable. BART attains near-nominal coverage at individual sites but experiences catastrophic calibration collapse under regional pooling, driven by fixed noise priors inadequate for spatially heterogeneous data. In contrast, GPR maintains robust probabilistic skill regionally despite larger point forecast RMSE penalties, achieving the lowest overall CRPS and near-nominal coverage through kernel-based variance inflation. Variable importance analysis identifies surface pressure and minimum temperature as dominant predictors (60–80%), with spatial covariates critical for regional differentiation. Operationally, regional QRF is prioritised for point accuracy, regional GPR for calibrated probabilistic forecasts in risk-sensitive applications, and at-site BART when local data suffice. These findings show that Bayesian machine learning methods can effectively navigate the trade-off between local specificity and regional pooling, a challenge common to wind forecasting in diverse terrain globally. The methodology and insights are transferable to other heterogeneous regions, providing guidance for probabilistic wind forecasting and renewable energy grid integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Climate
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli14010021
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.93
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic Wind Speed Forecasting Under at Site and Regional Frameworks: A Comparative Evaluation of BART, GPR, and QRF

Khaled Haddad, Ataur Rahman
1 citations
Climate
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
21.93
article

Probabilistic Wind Speed Forecasting Under at Site and Regional Frameworks: A Comparative Evaluation of BART, GPR, and QRF

Khaled Haddad, Ataur Rahman
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Reliable probabilistic wind speed forecasts are essential for integrating renewable energy into power grids and managing operational uncertainty. This study compares Quantile Regression Forests (QRF), Bayesian Additive Regression Trees (BART), and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) under at-site and regional pooled frameworks using 21 years (2000–2020) of daily wind data from eleven stations in New South Wales and Queensland, Australia. Models are evaluated via strict year-based holdout validation across seven metrics: RMSE, MAE, R2, bias, correlation, coverage, and Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS). Regional QRF achieves exceptional point forecast stability with minimal RMSE increase but suffers persistent under-coverage, rendering probabilistic bounds unreliable. BART attains near-nominal coverage at individual sites but experiences catastrophic calibration collapse under regional pooling, driven by fixed noise priors inadequate for spatially heterogeneous data. In contrast, GPR maintains robust probabilistic skill regionally despite larger point forecast RMSE penalties, achieving the lowest overall CRPS and near-nominal coverage through kernel-based variance inflation. Variable importance analysis identifies surface pressure and minimum temperature as dominant predictors (60–80%), with spatial covariates critical for regional differentiation. Operationally, regional QRF is prioritised for point accuracy, regional GPR for calibrated probabilistic forecasts in risk-sensitive applications, and at-site BART when local data suffice. These findings show that Bayesian machine learning methods can effectively navigate the trade-off between local specificity and regional pooling, a challenge common to wind forecasting in diverse terrain globally. The methodology and insights are transferable to other heterogeneous regions, providing guidance for probabilistic wind forecasting and renewable energy grid integration.

ClimateVol. 14(1)
Western Sydney University (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Energy Load and Power Forecasting
21.93
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.