A National Survey of Public Attitudes toward Biobanks and Human Bioresource Donation

The increasing use of human biospecimens and health data in research raises ethical and legal concerns regarding privacy, consent, and ownership. This study examined public awareness, attitudes, and concerns related to biospecimen and health data in South Korea. A nationwide online survey was conducted with 500 adults, stratified by region, age, and gender. The questionnaire assessed awareness levels, donation experience, motivations, and concerns related to biospecimen and health data donation. Statistical analyses using SPSS (version 29) included chi-square tests across demographic variables such as gender, age, education, and occupation. Awareness of biospecimen donation was moderate for biomedical research (55.2%) but lower for industrial research (42.2%). Awareness of biobanks was low (21.4%). Willingness to donate was higher for biomedical research (biospecimens 54.0%, health data 50.6%) than for industrial purposes (48.2%, 43.8%). The main motivations included humanitarian concerns and public benefit, while major concerns focused on privacy and physical discomfort. Most participants (72.2%) preferred detailed consent. Men were more willing to donate and expressed more favorable attitudes toward biospecimen and health data donation than women. The findings indicate moderate public awareness and willingness to donate biospecimens and health data, alongside persistent concerns about privacy, ownership, and compensation. Enhancing ethical governance and public engagement is essential to building trust in biobank-based research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35301/ksme.2025.28.4.293
Primary Topic
Ethics in Clinical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A National Survey of Public Attitudes toward Biobanks and Human Bioresource Donation

Seungmin Nam, Ivo Kwon, Hyeonji Jeon
Korean Journal of Medical Ethics
Ethics in Clinical Research
article

A National Survey of Public Attitudes toward Biobanks and Human Bioresource Donation

Seungmin Nam, Ivo Kwon, Hyeonji Jeon
article en

Abstract

The increasing use of human biospecimens and health data in research raises ethical and legal concerns regarding privacy, consent, and ownership. This study examined public awareness, attitudes, and concerns related to biospecimen and health data in South Korea. A nationwide online survey was conducted with 500 adults, stratified by region, age, and gender. The questionnaire assessed awareness levels, donation experience, motivations, and concerns related to biospecimen and health data donation. Statistical analyses using SPSS (version 29) included chi-square tests across demographic variables such as gender, age, education, and occupation. Awareness of biospecimen donation was moderate for biomedical research (55.2%) but lower for industrial research (42.2%). Awareness of biobanks was low (21.4%). Willingness to donate was higher for biomedical research (biospecimens 54.0%, health data 50.6%) than for industrial purposes (48.2%, 43.8%). The main motivations included humanitarian concerns and public benefit, while major concerns focused on privacy and physical discomfort. Most participants (72.2%) preferred detailed consent. Men were more willing to donate and expressed more favorable attitudes toward biospecimen and health data donation than women. The findings indicate moderate public awareness and willingness to donate biospecimens and health data, alongside persistent concerns about privacy, ownership, and compensation. Enhancing ethical governance and public engagement is essential to building trust in biobank-based research.

Korean Journal of Medical EthicsVol. 28(4)
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Ewha Womans University, Korea National Institute of Health
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Ethics in Clinical Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.