Economic assessment of seismic monitoring for underground hydrogen storage

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) plays a key role in the energy landscape. However, like other subsurface engineering technologies, UHS may cause leakage into the groundwater or atmosphere and possibly induce local seismicity. To reduce these risks, seismic monitoring could be a viable technique to track the UHS plume, detect leakages, and locate induced seismicity events. Seismic monitoring has been proposed to safely monitor UHS, but research in this area is still new and requires field studies. Lab and theoretical studies have demonstrated the validity of seismic monitoring for UHS. Therefore, it is imperative to analyze the economic feasibility of seismic monitoring for UHS. Hence, we develop a cost model and open-source Python code for seismic monitoring that considers types of seismometers, comprehensive operational scenarios, detection thresholds, and long-term leakage monitoring. A case study is further provided to validate the cost model on reservoir simulations of UHS. We find that the levelized cost for a 10-year operating UHS site will range on the order of ∼0.003 $/kg. The methods developed in this study could also be applied to the monitoring of groundwater, gas, and/or wastewater injection. • We construct an economic cost model for evaluating seismic monitoring costs for UHS. • We propose a passive seismic monitoring strategy based on noise thresholds. • We demonstrate the cost model on 3D reservoir simulations of UHS and leakage scenarios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2026.153524
Primary Topic
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Economic assessment of seismic monitoring for underground hydrogen storage

Mohamed Lamine Malki, Shaowen Mao, Axel Perwira Indro, Jake Parsons et al.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
article

Economic assessment of seismic monitoring for underground hydrogen storage

Mohamed Lamine Malki, Shaowen Mao, Axel Perwira Indro, Jake Parsons, Neala Creasy, Yao Huang, Mohamed Mehana
article en

Abstract

Underground hydrogen storage (UHS) plays a key role in the energy landscape. However, like other subsurface engineering technologies, UHS may cause leakage into the groundwater or atmosphere and possibly induce local seismicity. To reduce these risks, seismic monitoring could be a viable technique to track the UHS plume, detect leakages, and locate induced seismicity events. Seismic monitoring has been proposed to safely monitor UHS, but research in this area is still new and requires field studies. Lab and theoretical studies have demonstrated the validity of seismic monitoring for UHS. Therefore, it is imperative to analyze the economic feasibility of seismic monitoring for UHS. Hence, we develop a cost model and open-source Python code for seismic monitoring that considers types of seismometers, comprehensive operational scenarios, detection thresholds, and long-term leakage monitoring. A case study is further provided to validate the cost model on reservoir simulations of UHS. We find that the levelized cost for a 10-year operating UHS site will range on the order of ∼0.003 $/kg. The methods developed in this study could also be applied to the monitoring of groundwater, gas, and/or wastewater injection. • We construct an economic cost model for evaluating seismic monitoring costs for UHS. • We propose a passive seismic monitoring strategy based on noise thresholds. • We demonstrate the cost model on 3D reservoir simulations of UHS and leakage scenarios.

International Journal of Hydrogen EnergyVol. 207
University of Wyoming (US), Los Alamos National Laboratory (US), University of Alberta (CA), Heriot-Watt University (GB), University of Houston (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.