Impact of drain spacing on subsurface drainage and greenhouse gas fluxes in a grassland on a Mollic gleysol in western Norway

To study the effect of drainage intensity on GHG emissions and N drainage losses in cool-humid Norway, we established drainage systems with 6 and 12 m drain spacing in a previously undrained sandy loam (Mollic gleysol) collecting data in the years 2014–2016. After sowing a mixed grass ley, subsurface drainage was larger (1271 versus 699 mm) and mean ground water table (GWT) lower (102 versus 79 cm) with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing. Water filled pore space (WFPS) remained high throughout most of the year (> 80 %). It was highest in 12 m drain spacing, but shortly after fertilizations no differences between the two drainage systems were found. N 2 O emissions after fertilization were larger in the 12 m system than in the 6 m system. Cumulative N 2 O emissions in the 6 and 12 m system were 4.0 versus 2.5 kg N ha −2 yr −1 . N leaching for the entire observation period (29 months) was larger in the 6 m (42 kg ha −1 ) than the 12 m (19 kg ha −1 ) system . Grass yields, plant N-recovery and fertilizer N use efficiency was larger with 6 than 12 m. The mean N 2 O emission factor was significantly higher with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing (1.4 versus 0.8 % N 2 O-N of N applied). The 6 m system acted as a net sink for CH 4 , whereas the 12 m system was a net CH 4 source and had a higher climate forcing than the 12 m system (1390 versus 1110 g CO 2 eq. m −2 yr −1 ), but scaled for grass dry matter yield the climate forcing was similar. We conclude that larger N 2 O emissions with 6 m drain spacing were likely due to a combination of less complete denitrification and a naturally higher SOM content at this site, releasing extra mineral N. Our study can therefore not confirm that increased drainage intensity intrinsically reduces N 2 O emissions from crop production in cool-humid climates. • Reducing drain spacing from 12 to 6 m did not reduce N 2 O emissions. • Soil variation has a large effect on the impact of drain spacing on N 2 O emission. • Reduced drain spacing increased subsurface drainage and N-leaching. • Soil conditions were more reductive with 12 than 6 m drain spacing. • Reduced drain spacing changed CH 4 fluxes from net emission to net uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Soil and Tillage Research
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2026.107067
Primary Topic
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of drain spacing on subsurface drainage and greenhouse gas fluxes in a grassland on a Mollic gleysol in western Norway

Synnøve Rivedal, Johannes Deelstra, Sissel Helene Hansen, Trond Børresen et al.
Soil and Tillage Research
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
article

Impact of drain spacing on subsurface drainage and greenhouse gas fluxes in a grassland on a Mollic gleysol in western Norway

Synnøve Rivedal, Johannes Deelstra, Sissel Helene Hansen, Trond Børresen, Samson Øpstad, Torfinn Torp, Peter Dörsch
article en

Abstract

To study the effect of drainage intensity on GHG emissions and N drainage losses in cool-humid Norway, we established drainage systems with 6 and 12 m drain spacing in a previously undrained sandy loam (Mollic gleysol) collecting data in the years 2014–2016. After sowing a mixed grass ley, subsurface drainage was larger (1271 versus 699 mm) and mean ground water table (GWT) lower (102 versus 79 cm) with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing. Water filled pore space (WFPS) remained high throughout most of the year (> 80 %). It was highest in 12 m drain spacing, but shortly after fertilizations no differences between the two drainage systems were found. N 2 O emissions after fertilization were larger in the 12 m system than in the 6 m system. Cumulative N 2 O emissions in the 6 and 12 m system were 4.0 versus 2.5 kg N ha −2 yr −1 . N leaching for the entire observation period (29 months) was larger in the 6 m (42 kg ha −1 ) than the 12 m (19 kg ha −1 ) system . Grass yields, plant N-recovery and fertilizer N use efficiency was larger with 6 than 12 m. The mean N 2 O emission factor was significantly higher with 6 than with 12 m drain spacing (1.4 versus 0.8 % N 2 O-N of N applied). The 6 m system acted as a net sink for CH 4 , whereas the 12 m system was a net CH 4 source and had a higher climate forcing than the 12 m system (1390 versus 1110 g CO 2 eq. m −2 yr −1 ), but scaled for grass dry matter yield the climate forcing was similar. We conclude that larger N 2 O emissions with 6 m drain spacing were likely due to a combination of less complete denitrification and a naturally higher SOM content at this site, releasing extra mineral N. Our study can therefore not confirm that increased drainage intensity intrinsically reduces N 2 O emissions from crop production in cool-humid climates. • Reducing drain spacing from 12 to 6 m did not reduce N 2 O emissions. • Soil variation has a large effect on the impact of drain spacing on N 2 O emission. • Reduced drain spacing increased subsurface drainage and N-leaching. • Soil conditions were more reductive with 12 than 6 m drain spacing. • Reduced drain spacing changed CH 4 fluxes from net emission to net uptake.

Soil and Tillage ResearchVol. 259
NORCE Research AS (NO), Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NO), Norwegian Centre for Organic Agriculture (NO), Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NO)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.