Evaluation of large language models in rheumatology and clinical immunology: a systematic assessment based on Chinese national health professional qualification examination

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in natural language processing and demonstrated potential applications in medicine. However, their professional capabilities in specific medical subfields, such as immunology, still require systematic evaluation. This study systematically evaluated 11 representative LLMs, including DeepSeek, GPT, Llama, Gemma, and Qwen series, based on the Chinese National Health Professional Qualification Examination in Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology. The evaluation covered four dimensions: basic medical knowledge, related medical knowledge, immunology knowledge, and professional practice ability. Results show significant differences among LLMs. DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen3 achieve the best performance, with accuracy exceeding 90%. However, performance on professional practice ability tasks remained relatively low, highlighting limitations in complex clinical applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Medicine
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1716122
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of large language models in rheumatology and clinical immunology: a systematic assessment based on Chinese national health professional qualification examination

Yijun Xu, Weinan Lin, Qin Song, YaQing Wang et al.
Frontiers in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Evaluation of large language models in rheumatology and clinical immunology: a systematic assessment based on Chinese national health professional qualification examination

Yijun Xu, Weinan Lin, Qin Song, YaQing Wang, Yue Jiang, Zhaoxi Fang, Wen Jin, Jiangda Wang
article en

Abstract

In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in natural language processing and demonstrated potential applications in medicine. However, their professional capabilities in specific medical subfields, such as immunology, still require systematic evaluation. This study systematically evaluated 11 representative LLMs, including DeepSeek, GPT, Llama, Gemma, and Qwen series, based on the Chinese National Health Professional Qualification Examination in Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology. The evaluation covered four dimensions: basic medical knowledge, related medical knowledge, immunology knowledge, and professional practice ability. Results show significant differences among LLMs. DeepSeek-R1 and Qwen3 achieve the best performance, with accuracy exceeding 90%. However, performance on professional practice ability tasks remained relatively low, highlighting limitations in complex clinical applications.

Frontiers in MedicineVol. 12
University of South Africa (ZA), Shaoxing University (CN), Institute of Art (PL), Zhejiang Pharmaceutical College (CN), Materials Technology (United Kingdom) (GB)
Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.