Direct oral anticoagulants: does one dose fit all? Why, when and how testing

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are commonly prescribed using fixed-dose regimens, based on the assumption of predictable pharmacokinetics and a favorable balance between efficacy and safety. As a result, laboratory assessment is often considered unnecessary in patients receiving DOAC. However, increasing evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies challenges this “one-dose-fits-all” paradigm, demonstrating marked interindividual variability in drug exposure. Importantly, extreme plasma concentrations have been associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events or bleeding complications. This article revisits the role of the clinical laboratory in the management of patients treated with DOAC, clearly distinguishing routine dose adjustment from targeted measurement in selected clinical scenarios. It discusses situations in which laboratory testing may meaningfully support clinical decision-making, as well as practical considerations regarding DOAC measurement and their interference with commonly used hemostatic assays. Overall, a more nuanced, patient-centered use of laboratory testing may improve the safety and effectiveness of DOAC therapy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bleeding Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4081/btvb.2026.418
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Direct oral anticoagulants: does one dose fit all? Why, when and how testing

Armando Tripodi
1 citations
Bleeding Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
30.07
article

Direct oral anticoagulants: does one dose fit all? Why, when and how testing

Armando Tripodi
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are commonly prescribed using fixed-dose regimens, based on the assumption of predictable pharmacokinetics and a favorable balance between efficacy and safety. As a result, laboratory assessment is often considered unnecessary in patients receiving DOAC. However, increasing evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies challenges this “one-dose-fits-all” paradigm, demonstrating marked interindividual variability in drug exposure. Importantly, extreme plasma concentrations have been associated with an increased risk of thrombotic events or bleeding complications. This article revisits the role of the clinical laboratory in the management of patients treated with DOAC, clearly distinguishing routine dose adjustment from targeted measurement in selected clinical scenarios. It discusses situations in which laboratory testing may meaningfully support clinical decision-making, as well as practical considerations regarding DOAC measurement and their interference with commonly used hemostatic assays. Overall, a more nuanced, patient-centered use of laboratory testing may improve the safety and effectiveness of DOAC therapy.

Bleeding Thrombosis and Vascular BiologyVol. 5(1)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
30.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Direct oral anticoagulants: does one dose fit all? Why, when and how testing — Armando Tripodi · Bleeding Thrombosis and Vascular Biology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS