Galaxy infall models for arbitrary velocity directions

For most galaxies in the cosmos, our knowledge of their motion is limited to line-of-sight velocities from redshift observations. To determine the radial velocity between two galaxies, the “minor” and “major infall models” were established by Igor Karachentsev and colleagues. Regardless of the background cosmology, our derivations reveal that these infall models approximate the total radial velocity between two galaxies by two different projections employing different information about the system. For galaxies that have small angular separations, θ, all infall models agree that the radial velocity is the difference of their line-of-sight components. Applying these models to around 500 halos of the Illustris-3 simulation, we find the perpendicular and tangential velocity parts to be non-negligible for more than 90% of over 5000 infalling subhalos investigated. Thus, even for θ < 10 deg, the infall-model velocities deviate from the true radial velocity. Only for 30% did we find the true one lay between the minor and major infall velocity. However, the infall models yield robust upper and lower limits to the true radial velocity dispersion. Observed under θ < 10 deg, the velocity dispersion inferred from the sole difference of line-of-sight velocity components even coincides with the true one, justifying this approach for high-redshift groups and clusters. Based on these findings, we predict the radial velocity dispersion of the M81 group from the minor infall model (upper bound) to be σr, min = (180 ± 42) km/s, from the major infall model (lower bound) to be σr, maj = (142 ± 64) km/s and σr, Δv = (99 ± 36) km/s from the line-of-sight-velocity difference.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202553892/pdf
Primary Topic
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Galaxy infall models for arbitrary velocity directions

David Benisty, Jenny Wagner
Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
article

Galaxy infall models for arbitrary velocity directions

David Benisty, Jenny Wagner
article en

Abstract

For most galaxies in the cosmos, our knowledge of their motion is limited to line-of-sight velocities from redshift observations. To determine the radial velocity between two galaxies, the “minor” and “major infall models” were established by Igor Karachentsev and colleagues. Regardless of the background cosmology, our derivations reveal that these infall models approximate the total radial velocity between two galaxies by two different projections employing different information about the system. For galaxies that have small angular separations, θ, all infall models agree that the radial velocity is the difference of their line-of-sight components. Applying these models to around 500 halos of the Illustris-3 simulation, we find the perpendicular and tangential velocity parts to be non-negligible for more than 90% of over 5000 infalling subhalos investigated. Thus, even for θ < 10 deg, the infall-model velocities deviate from the true radial velocity. Only for 30% did we find the true one lay between the minor and major infall velocity. However, the infall models yield robust upper and lower limits to the true radial velocity dispersion. Observed under θ < 10 deg, the velocity dispersion inferred from the sole difference of line-of-sight velocity components even coincides with the true one, justifying this approach for high-redshift groups and clusters. Based on these findings, we predict the radial velocity dispersion of the M81 group from the minor infall model (upper bound) to be σr, min = (180 ± 42) km/s, from the major infall model (lower bound) to be σr, maj = (142 ± 64) km/s and σr, Δv = (99 ± 36) km/s from the line-of-sight-velocity difference.

Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.