Experimental Study on the Improvement of Bearing Capacity of Soft Clay by Using Reinforced Sand Cushion Resting on Encased Stone Columns

Soft clay deposits present challenges such as high settlement and low bearing capacity in construction projects. Various techniques, including stone columns and encased stone columns, have been developed to reduce settlement and enhance bearing capacity in soft clay soils having cohesion (Cu) less than 25 KPa. This research investigates the use of ordinary stone columns and encased stone columns through experimental modeling. Additionally, the study aims to enhance the bearing capacity of soft clay soil by using reinforced sand cushion resting on encased stone columns. A series of tests were conducted with various parameters such as geosynthetic materials, column diameter, and spacing. The results were analyzed in terms of stress-settlement curves and improvement ratios. The findings demonstrate that the diameter of stone columns significantly influences in bearing capacity, with optimum economic improvement ratio achieved at 50% of the footing diameter. The optimal spacing between stone columns is twice their diameter for the best performance and economic efficiency. The best economic thickness of the sand cushion over encased stone columns is 0.2 times the footing width. The optimal diameter for the reinforced sand cushion is approximately two and a half times the footing width; any further increase results in negligible improvement. The bearing capacity of reinforced sand cushions is more than double that of unreinforced sand cushions.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
HBRC Journal
Published
2025-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.65800/2090-9934.1003
Primary Topic
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental Study on the Improvement of Bearing Capacity of Soft Clay by Using Reinforced Sand Cushion Resting on Encased Stone Columns

Youssef Gomaa Youssef, G. E. Abdelrahman, Mahmoud Eid Abd
HBRC Journal
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
article

Experimental Study on the Improvement of Bearing Capacity of Soft Clay by Using Reinforced Sand Cushion Resting on Encased Stone Columns

Youssef Gomaa Youssef, G. E. Abdelrahman, Mahmoud Eid Abd
article en

Abstract

Soft clay deposits present challenges such as high settlement and low bearing capacity in construction projects. Various techniques, including stone columns and encased stone columns, have been developed to reduce settlement and enhance bearing capacity in soft clay soils having cohesion (Cu) less than 25 KPa. This research investigates the use of ordinary stone columns and encased stone columns through experimental modeling. Additionally, the study aims to enhance the bearing capacity of soft clay soil by using reinforced sand cushion resting on encased stone columns. A series of tests were conducted with various parameters such as geosynthetic materials, column diameter, and spacing. The results were analyzed in terms of stress-settlement curves and improvement ratios. The findings demonstrate that the diameter of stone columns significantly influences in bearing capacity, with optimum economic improvement ratio achieved at 50% of the footing diameter. The optimal spacing between stone columns is twice their diameter for the best performance and economic efficiency. The best economic thickness of the sand cushion over encased stone columns is 0.2 times the footing width. The optimal diameter for the reinforced sand cushion is approximately two and a half times the footing width; any further increase results in negligible improvement. The bearing capacity of reinforced sand cushions is more than double that of unreinforced sand cushions.

HBRC JournalVol. 22(1)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.