Ensuring the Public Health Impact of Malaria Vaccination in High-Transmission Settings

Two vaccines against Plasmodium falciparum, RTS,S and R21, have been recommended for widespread implementation by the World Health Organization. Both vaccines displayed safety and efficacy in clinical trials, and early RTS,S pilot implementation results suggested reductions in severe disease and death. However, RTS,S efficacy was lower in higher transmission settings during trials. Between- and within-site analyses suggest that reduced efficacy was partially due to greater natural immunity development in control groups in higher transmission settings, resulting in temporary periods of negative efficacy beginning approximately three years after the primary vaccine series. Results from RTS,S pilot implementation and seasonal administration for both vaccines are promising, but study designs have thus far precluded the identification of similar periods of negative efficacy. Because we expect delayed malaria cases of unknown severity in vaccinated individuals during implementation in high-transmission settings, we recommend enhanced surveillance and interventions that supplement malaria vaccination to strengthen prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.25-0613
Primary Topic
Malaria Research and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ensuring the Public Health Impact of Malaria Vaccination in High-Transmission Settings

Ann M. Moormann, Michael E. Emch, Jeffrey A. Bailey
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
Malaria Research and Control
article

Ensuring the Public Health Impact of Malaria Vaccination in High-Transmission Settings

Ann M. Moormann, Michael E. Emch, Jeffrey A. Bailey
article en

Abstract

Two vaccines against Plasmodium falciparum, RTS,S and R21, have been recommended for widespread implementation by the World Health Organization. Both vaccines displayed safety and efficacy in clinical trials, and early RTS,S pilot implementation results suggested reductions in severe disease and death. However, RTS,S efficacy was lower in higher transmission settings during trials. Between- and within-site analyses suggest that reduced efficacy was partially due to greater natural immunity development in control groups in higher transmission settings, resulting in temporary periods of negative efficacy beginning approximately three years after the primary vaccine series. Results from RTS,S pilot implementation and seasonal administration for both vaccines are promising, but study designs have thus far precluded the identification of similar periods of negative efficacy. Because we expect delayed malaria cases of unknown severity in vaccinated individuals during implementation in high-transmission settings, we recommend enhanced surveillance and interventions that supplement malaria vaccination to strengthen prevention.

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneVol. 114(3)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), Brown University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Malaria Research and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.