Gain vs. Loss Framing in Rational and Emotional Appeals: Effects on Consumer Attitudes, Reactance, and Brand Choice.

Consumers are exposed to a vast number of advertisements daily, yet how message frames (gain vs. loss) interact with different advertising appeals (rational, positive emotional, negative emotional) to influence attitudes remains unclear. Although prior research has examined message frames and advertising appeals independently, limited work has explored their combined effects. Drawing on psychological reactance theory and broaden-and-build theory, this study addresses this gap by investigating how gain and loss frames interact with ad appeal types to shape consumer attitudes and psychological reactance. Using a 2 (message frame: gain vs. loss) × 3 (appeal type: rational, positive emotional, negative emotional) experimental design with 219 U.S. participants, the findings show that gain-framed messages produce significantly more positive ad and brand attitudes for rational and positive emotional appeals. Reactance mediates these effects but not for negative emotional appeals, where the message frame shows no significant influence. These results extend advertising theory and provide practical guidance for marketers, suggesting that aligning message framing with the emotional tone of advertisements can enhance campaign effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Marketing Management Journal
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63963/001c.154848
Primary Topic
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gain vs. Loss Framing in Rational and Emotional Appeals: Effects on Consumer Attitudes, Reactance, and Brand Choice.

Monika Rawal, Joanna Phillips Melancon, Mavis Adjei, Rajat Sharma
Marketing Management Journal
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
article

Gain vs. Loss Framing in Rational and Emotional Appeals: Effects on Consumer Attitudes, Reactance, and Brand Choice.

Monika Rawal, Joanna Phillips Melancon, Mavis Adjei, Rajat Sharma
article en

Abstract

Consumers are exposed to a vast number of advertisements daily, yet how message frames (gain vs. loss) interact with different advertising appeals (rational, positive emotional, negative emotional) to influence attitudes remains unclear. Although prior research has examined message frames and advertising appeals independently, limited work has explored their combined effects. Drawing on psychological reactance theory and broaden-and-build theory, this study addresses this gap by investigating how gain and loss frames interact with ad appeal types to shape consumer attitudes and psychological reactance. Using a 2 (message frame: gain vs. loss) × 3 (appeal type: rational, positive emotional, negative emotional) experimental design with 219 U.S. participants, the findings show that gain-framed messages produce significantly more positive ad and brand attitudes for rational and positive emotional appeals. Reactance mediates these effects but not for negative emotional appeals, where the message frame shows no significant influence. These results extend advertising theory and provide practical guidance for marketers, suggesting that aligning message framing with the emotional tone of advertisements can enhance campaign effectiveness.

Marketing Management JournalVol. 35(1)
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US), Millsaps College (US), Western Kentucky University (US), University of Memphis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 90%
Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.