Corporate Control Through External Whistleblowing: Initial Findings from Germany

Abstract In Germany, whistleblowing was only regulated and institutionalized after a long, tough political debate. This transpired solely due to the country’s obligation to comply with EU law and its legal obligation to implement EU Directive 2019/1937. As a result, structures were created to stimulate external whistleblowing and to use these new mechanisms as a central instrument of corporate control. The extent to which this concept is being realized in practice is the subject of the present article. A thorough examination of the reports received by the central German reporting body shows that only few corporate crimes have been detected and sanctioned through external whistleblowing so far. Limited willingness to report, competition with internal reporting systems, as well as intensive protection of the confidentiality of whistleblowers, are some of the main reasons for this situation as suggested by the present study. Consequently, legal policy expectations towards external whistleblowing should be adapted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Published
2026-01-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-025-09655-8
Primary Topic
Corporate Law and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate Control Through External Whistleblowing: Initial Findings from Germany

Ralf Kölbel
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Corporate Law and Human Rights
article

Corporate Control Through External Whistleblowing: Initial Findings from Germany

Ralf Kölbel
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Germany, whistleblowing was only regulated and institutionalized after a long, tough political debate. This transpired solely due to the country’s obligation to comply with EU law and its legal obligation to implement EU Directive 2019/1937. As a result, structures were created to stimulate external whistleblowing and to use these new mechanisms as a central instrument of corporate control. The extent to which this concept is being realized in practice is the subject of the present article. A thorough examination of the reports received by the central German reporting body shows that only few corporate crimes have been detected and sanctioned through external whistleblowing so far. Limited willingness to report, competition with internal reporting systems, as well as intensive protection of the confidentiality of whistleblowers, are some of the main reasons for this situation as suggested by the present study. Consequently, legal policy expectations towards external whistleblowing should be adapted.

European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Corporate Law and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Corporate Control Through External Whistleblowing: Initial Findings from Germany — Ralf Kölbel · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS