Textbook outcome and long-term survival after pulmonary resection for non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study
Textbook outcome is a composite measure reflecting an ideal perioperative course by integrating multiple care-quality indicators. While its use has been reported internationally for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection, it has not previously been evaluated in the Australian setting. This study aimed to determine the proportion of patients achieving a textbook outcome after NSCLC resection, identify the components that most commonly prevented its attainment, and evaluate its association with long-term overall survival. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of adults undergoing lung resection for primary NSCLC at a tertiary Australian centre (2011–2023). Textbook outcome was defined according to the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit–Surgery criteria, requiring negative margins, complete lymph node dissection, absence of major complications, no 30-day mortality or reintervention, no prolonged ICU/high-dependency stay, no prolonged hospitalisation, and no readmission. Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of textbook outcome, and Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess long-term survival. Of 731 patients, 163 (22.3%) met all textbook outcome criteria. Failure to achieve the composite outcome was most commonly caused by incomplete lymph node dissection (67.6%), reintervention (22.5%), major complications (20.2%), or prolonged stay (13.2%). Male sex (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36–0.77) and open surgery (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.35–0.83) were associated with lower odds of meeting the criteria, while carcinoid histology increased the odds (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.04–3.45). Patients who met the textbook outcome criteria had higher survival (5-year: 89.7% vs. 70.8%; 10-year: 82.0% vs. 60.7%; log-rank p < 0.001). Textbook outcome was achieved in approximately one-fifth of patients and was strongly associated with improved long-term survival. Enhancing lymph node dissection and wider adoption of minimally invasive surgery may help increase textbook outcome rates and represents a potential focus for future quality-improvement initiatives. This study was retrospectively registered in the Australian-New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12625000913471).
Authors
- Josué Elías
- Fabien Chu
- Stephen Barnett (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8350-2860)
- Nattaya Raykateeraroj (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1212-2115)
- Simon Knight (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4837-9446)
- Luca Petterlin
- Chin Jin Ker
- Dong Kyu Lee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4068-2363)
- Ronald Ma
- Junyan Zhao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0253-501X)
- Ella Francis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7648-7079)
- Sepideh Roshanaei
- Prabhashi Ratnayakemudiyanselage
- Fawaz Ahmed Prem Navaz
- Harry Botta
- Laurence Weinberg
- Evina Ling
- Je Min Suh
Institutions
- Siriraj Hospital (TH)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Mahidol University (TH)
- Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital (KR)
- Austin Health (AU)
Publication Details
- Journal
- World Journal of Surgical Oncology
- Published
- 2026-01-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-026-04195-9
- Primary Topic
- Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00